I know from other OpenSource work I've done that version numbering/formatting can become a heated debate but I too would suggest you went for a version less than 1.0.
I don't think "noone wants to run 1.0" is a valid argument. The only people I know that would fall in to are people that need 99.99% up time or are OS adverse. Even if it was v4.0 it is just marketing and I would still class it as a "young" OS solution as I can't find versions 3,2 and 1. I wouldn't put it into serious production use without having done some testing which would then be reflected in the maturity of the project as any problems I found would be reported. Just my thoughts, what I really mean to say is don't spend to much effort on picking the version number for your first release. Just release and release often. Now I've heard that somewhere before. ;) Cheers On 09/05/07, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all > > first of all, we've just put CW into production, and it works well. > not a lot of users yet, but they're moving over slowly > > and then to the point. http://callweaver.org/milestones sets a 1.2.0 > release date to 1. june, which is ok. However, the version number > 1.2.0 looks somehow wrong to me. The arguments for this (as from > ctrix) are mainly "it was based on asterisk 1.2" and "noone wants to > run 1.0". IMHO naming the first release of a project for something > > 1.0 will be a lie. Some companies, like IBM, do this (The first AIX 4 > was 4.1), but then this is probably anti-1.0-marketing. > > I would like to suggest the first release of CW should be named > either 0.1.0 (the coppice way), 0.9.0 (as in 'it's stable but it's > not yet finished') or 1.0, but nothing > 1.0, since this is indeed a > new project, and although based on openpbx, openpbx neither had any > official releases > > regards > > roy > > > _______________________________________________ > Callweaver-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev > -- Martin Ritchie _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
