Le 07-05-09 à 11:54, Max CtRiX a écrit : > > For CW i have proposed to get rid of the numbering scheme which is > useless and silly. We already have a SVN revision number and that's > enough.
with all due respect, I disagree here. - svn revision numbers are good for developers perspective: it is an exact image of the source code. But I wonder how end users, admins, etc... will like to load the 6348503 version of CW. Does not look great to me. - again, version numbers give users (our customers of our code) an easy reference point. it gives them a way to know: + which version is earlier, after another one, based on something.... + with X.Y.Z proposed before, will enable users to keep on the same branch and only update for security/minor bug fixes, which gives them stability for config and confort to put a new version into test and prod. all of this is not possible with a fancy name and svn version number. Marc. > > I proposed to call each CW version with some fancy name, like > debian or > ubuntu does. > > Max > _______________________________________________ > Callweaver-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev ----- IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley, 2006, http://www.ipv6book.ca _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
