Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > Den 10.5.2007 kl. 10:35 skrev Ming-Wei Shih: > > >> This horse is long dead, way before the name change.1.2 was >> chosen about a year ago IIRC. There is no right nor wrong >> about any versioning scheme, but 1.2 was just the most "natural" >> number for the first version of CW (please dig the archive for >> reasons). >> >> Please let's just have a release, and what's in a name/number? >> > > 1.2 is stupid. 1.0 means 'first version'. opbx never had a release, > and callweaver doesn't have any yet. or - why don't we start with > 2.7? 3.14? 9827349874? >
Why are you so obsessed with numb3rs? :-) _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
