Steve, Yes, that's an IP address I modified to protect the stupid.
I noticed you made some CED changes in the recent SpanDSP. That may or may not help but I'd need to test it out tomorrow. - Julian On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Steve Underwood <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Julian, > > In your log I can't see any received T.38 packets. i do, however see a > really interesting IP address, which seems to have come from the SIP > information - 99.999.183.2 > > Regards, > Steve > > > Julian Yap wrote: >> I found it works on occasions. The times that it does work, I see >> something like this in the logs: >> Jan 26 14:55:57 DEBUG app_t38gateway.c: FAX CED tone detected in T38 >> gateway!!! >> Jan 26 14:55:57 DEBUG chan_sip.c: Forcing reinvite on SIP >> (SIP/10001008-e984) for T.38 negotiation. >> >> The times I don't see that, the Fax fails. >> >> Any clues on why it sometimes does and does not have those lines and >> how I can consistently get it to work? >> >> Thanks, >> Julian >> >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Julian Yap <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering if there was anything obviously wrong with my test of >>> the T38Gateway application here: >>> http://callweaver.pastebin.com/m797c1f5c >>> >>> In my extensions.conf, this is the line I used for testing: >>> exten => _8085859999, 1, T38Gateway(DAHDI/g1/8085859999) >>> >>> (DID's and IP's changed in the paste) >>> >>> If required, I can produce another debug with different options. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Julian >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Callweaver-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Callweaver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users > _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
