ACCORDING TO THE VIETNAMESE INTELLIGENCE NETWORK POSTED BY its AGENT nacongthu." Sarah Palin Is NOT The Mother [Photos+Video]. Does nacongthu the Vietnamese communist agent has a mother too ? You are evil like all communists And communicated to
To: [email protected] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] A VIETNAMESE IS A THIEF ,A LIAR, CHEATER, KILLER ....( BOOK BY T.TERZANI Giai Phong" SEE THE VIETNAMESE : SOK KONG IS A VIETNAMESE YEAY PHAN IS A VIETNAMESE IN CAMBODIA OCCUPIED BY VIETNAM Again here are my solutions to this problems:PRESIDENT REAGAN INSISTS THROUGH 10 UN RESOLUTIONS1. that the KR regime must not allowed to come back to power in Cambodia2. that Vietnam cease her occupation of Cambodia followed by total withdrawal of Viet troops from Cambodia. VIETNAM INVASION & OCCUPATION OF CAMBODIA : 1979-2008 Nearly 30 years, under Vietnam rule of Cambodia, Cambodian youth are denied minimum of education and jobs that result in suicide, TRADE OF VIEGINITY , robbery,CRIMES ACROSS CAMBODIA EVERYDAY , due to hunger,injustice, and unemployement. 10 UN RESOLUTIONS,(1979-1988) VOTED BY 116 UN MEMBER COUNTRIES ,CALL VIETNAM TO CEASE HER OCCUPATION OF CAMBODIA & REMOVE ALL HER TROOPS FROM THE COUNTRY ARE NOT RESPECTED. SUCH AS THESE : Nov. 14, 1979 The UN General Assembly adopts a resolution A/RES/34/22 calling for the immediate withdrawal of all foreign troops from Cambodia. The vote is 91-21 with 29 abstentions.Oct. 21, 1986 The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution A/RES/41/6, by vote of 116-21 with 13 abstentions, calling for a withdrawal of Vietnamese forces from Cambodia. A VIETNAMESE IS A THIEF ,A LIAR, CHEATER, KILLER ....( BOOK BY T.TERZANI Giai Phong" Aug. 23, 1966 PRC PM Zhou Enlai advises Pham Van Dong, in their meeting in Beijing, to make full use of the road via Cambodia as well as the sea route. The Chinese also agree to Vietnamese request for reinforcement of forces for air defense, defense of railways, land roads, and aid to build roads. June 6, 1967 Nguyen Huu Tho, NLF president, respond favorably by letter to Prince Sihanouk’s appeal for the recognition and respect of Cambodia’s territorial integrity. June 8, 1967 North VN PM Pham Van Dong makes a declaration of recognizing Cambodian independence, neutrality, sovereignty and territorial integrity. The declaration makes in response to Prince Sihanouk’s appeal for the recognition and respect of Cambodia’s territorial integrity.Aug. 27, 1967 Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) opens its embassy in Phnom Penh Jan. 30, 1968 Vietnamese Communists launches their Tet offensive in South Vietnam. March 7, 1968CIA issues an intelligence report indicating the Vietnamese Communists continue to use Cambodian territory for tactical sanctuary, for base areas, for the infiltration of personnel, and as a source of rice, medicines, and sundry supplies. Nov. 17, 1968Mao Zedong and Pham Van Dong meet in Beijing to discuss war and Chinese aid to the war effort in Vietnam. April 15, 1969 US recognize the sovereignty, independence, neutrality, and territorial integrity of Cambodia, two years after Prince Sihanouk made an appeal. April 20, 1969Zhou Enlai and Pham Van Dong meet in Beijing to discuss various issues; regarding to Cambodia, Zhou Enlai says: "New developments have been seen in Indochina. May 8, 1969 NLF/Vietcong representation in Phnom Penh is raised to embassy level. On the same day, Cambodia agrees to diplomatic relations with the communist East Germany. Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:48:04 -0700From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sarah Palin Is NOT The Mother [Photos+Video].To: [email protected] Documentation of the Bush administration’s determination and plans for war and accompanying denials 1-30-2001: Ten days after taking office, at Bush’s first national security meeting, the top item on the agenda is finding an excuse for invading Iraq. 3-5-2001: Pentagon produces “Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts”, including a map of areas for potential oil exploration, for Cheney’s task force. 9-20-01: Bush tells Tony Blair, “… When we have dealt with Afghanistan, we must come back to Iraq.” 9-20-01: PNAC letter to Bush: “Even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power.” 11-21-01: Bush to Rumsfeld: “What have you got in terms of plans for Iraq? What is the status of the war plan? I want you to get on it. I want you to keep it secret.” 1-29-02: Bush delivers his “Axis of Evil” speech, written by his speech writer David Frum after being asked “Can you sum up in a sentence or two our best case for going after Iraq?” 3-8-02: First Downing Street memo prepared by top Britain national security aid states that “Washington believes the legal basis for an attack on Iraq already exists…” 3-22-02: Downing Street memo states “US scrambling to establish a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda is so far frankly unconvincing… It sounds like a grudge between Bush and Saddam.” March 2002: Cheney tells Republican senators that the question is no longer if the U..S. will invade Iraq but when. 4-4-02: Bush to Blair: “I made up my mind that Saddam needs to go.” 5-23-02: Bush states his opposition to hearings on the 9-11 attacks. June 2002: Condoleeza Rice to a deputy raising doubts about the need for war with Iraq: “Save your breath. The president has already made up his mind.” July 2002: Bush approves secret request from General Tommy Franks for $700 million in war preparations. 7-23-02: Downing Street memo written by Britain foreign secretary after visit with U.S. officials: “Military action was now seen as inevitable… The intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy…” August 2002: White House Iraq Group created to market war. 8-7-02: Bush given Iraq war plan by General Franks. 8-20-02: Bush: “We may or may not attack. I have no idea yet” 8-26-02: Cheney: There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends… and against us.” 9-16-01: Rumsfeld: “The president hasn’t made a decision to do anything with respect to Iraq.” 9-25-02: Bush: “You can’t distinguish between Al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror.” October 2002: Bush administration decided not to take out al-Zarqawi because any terrorist in Iraq helps case for war. According to a former NSC member, “People were more obsessed with developing the coalition to overthrow Saddam than to execute the president’s policy of preemption against terrorists.” 10-8-02: Knight Ridder report: “A growing number of military officers, intelligence professionals and diplomats in his own government privately have deep misgivings about the administration’s double-time march toward war. These officials charge that administration hawks have exaggerated evidence of the threat that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein poses… Analysts at the working level in the intelligence community are feeling very strong pressure from the Pentagon to cook the intelligence books…” 10-16-02: Bush to U.S. public: “I have not ordered the use of force.. I hope the use of force will not become necessary.” November 2002: CIA station chiefs at a secret meeting in London: War is inevitable, just a few months away. 11-7-02: Bush: “War is not my first choice. It’s my last choice.” 12-31-02: Bush to U.S. press: “You said we’re headed to war in Iraq. I don’t know why you say that… I’m the person who gets to decide, not you.” January 2003: Deputy CIA Director John McLaughlin to Scooter Libby, on being pressured to bolster the WMD intelligence: “I’m not going back to the well on this. We’ve done our work.” 1-31-03: Notes of meeting between Bush and Blair make clear that Bush intends to invade Iraq even if U.N. inspectors found no evidence of WMD. 3-7-03: U.S., Britain, and Spain present resolution to Saddam Hussein giving him an ultimatum to disarm by March 17 or face war. 3-8-03: Bush: “We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq.” 3-20-03: U.S. begins war on Iraq. Accumulation and marketing of phony evidence of Saddam Hussein’s intentions and development of WMD, in order to support war in Iraq The efforts to tie Saddam Hussein to the 9-11 attacks on our country were initiated remarkably quickly, especially considering the amazingly slow response mounted against the attacks themselves. Within two days of 9-11, the following occurred: 9-11-01: Five hours following the attacks on the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon, minutes taken by a Rumsfeld aide stated “Best info fast. Judge whether good enough {to} hit SH {Saddam Hussein}…” 9-12-01: Bush tells counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke, “I want you, as soon as you can, to go back over everything, everything. See if Saddam did this.” Bush asks for “any shred” of evidence that Saddam was involved. Nevertheless: 9-21-01: Bush briefed by intelligence community that there is no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the 9-11 attacks. But despite this, the Bush administration proceeded with its plans. In order to make the subsequent efforts of the Bush administration to gather and market evidence of the weapons of mass destruction (WMD) capabilities of Saddam Hussein easier to follow, the following is a description of overlapping time lines according to subject area: Efforts to obtain information through torture January 2002: Captured Al Qaeda operative, Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, states while being tortured that Al Qaeda has received chemical weapons from Iraq. February 2002: Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) intelligence summary says that al-Libi’s statement about Al Qaeda receiving chemical weapons from Iraq lacks pertinent details and that it is most likely false and based solely on his desire to stop being tortured. Report also notes that it is unlikely that Saddam would provide assistance to Al Qaeda. 4-9-02: Bush speaking to CIA Director George Tenet about captured Al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah: “I said he was important, you’re not going to let me lose face on this are you?... Do some of those harsh methods really work?” Zudaydah is then tortured and speaks of several plots. Claim that Iraq purchased enriched uranium from Africa The most serious threat that the Bush administration tried to establish was that Saddam Hussein was making a concerted effort to develop a nuclear weapons program. A major component of that effort was the allegation that he had purchased enriched uranium (often referred to as “yellowcake”) from Niger. The Bush administration clung to that claim despite a great deal of evidence against it: 3-5-02: Joe Wilson tells CIA that there is no indication that Iraq is buying yellowcake. Summer 2002: The French debunk the theory that Iraq tried to obtain yellowcake from Niger: “We told the Americans, ‘Bullshit. It doesn’t make any sense’”. October 2002: National Intelligence Estimate report states “claims of Iraqi pursuit of natural uranium {i.e., yellowcake} in Africa are highly dubious.” 10-6-02: NSC memo to White House on the claim that Iraq attempted to obtain uranium from Niger: “The evidence is weak… the Africa story is over-blown.” 3-3-03: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) tells U.S. that the Niger uranium documents were forgeries. 3-7-03: IAEA: After three months of intrusive inspections, we have to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapons program in Iraq.” 3-8-03: Joe Wilson on CNN: “I think it’s safe to say that the U.S. government should have or did know that the {Niger documents were} fake before Dr. ElBaradei mentioned it in his report at the U.N. yesterday.” But despite all that, on 12-7-02, the Bush administration discredited a report by Iraq to the United Nations, documenting all of its unconventional arms, on the basis that the report didn’t mention the alleged uranium that it acquired from Niger, and it used that discredited allegation as one of its major excuses for going to war. Claim that Iraq intended to use aluminum tubes to produce enriched uranium for use in a nuclear weapon The other major alleged evidence pointing to a nuclear weapons program in Iraq was the Iraqis’ purchase of aluminum tubes, which the Bush administration claimed was proof that they intended to use them to enrich uranium for use in a nuclear weapon. In September of 2002, the Bush administration began to push that bogus claim: 9-7-02: Bush claims a new U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report states Iraq is six months from developing a nuclear weapon – though no such report existed..._________________________________________________________________ See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are part of your life. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
