After   listen   Hun sen   speaking  , I think   now  it  is Mr  Samrainsy
's  turn  to   stay   in  exile ,contrary   to  Prince   Ranarirh  he
just   paid  all    his  debt   so  it  will be    safe   to  come  home
...ខ្ញុំថាតាំងពីយូយាណាស់មកហើយ  ថាតាសមរង្ស៊ីនេះ ជាមនុស្សមាត់ដាចណាស់
ចូលចិត្តជេរគេច្រើន  តែអត់បានការ  ចុះឡើងៗ ត្រូវព្រនូង តែដោសា
សម្តីខ្លួនឯង  ។សួរថាតើ មនុស្សដែលចេះនិយាយមិនចេះគិតគូទាល់តែសោះរបៀបនេះ  តើមាន
សមត្ថភាពអីទៅដឹកនាំប្រទេស?   បើប្រៀបធៀបជាមួយលោកកឹមសុខាវិញ  លោកកឹមសុខា
គាត់គ្រាន់បើជាងឆ្ងាយណាស់  គាត់ប្រឆាំងជាមួយហ៊ុនសែនមែន
តែដោយប្រើពាក្យសម្តីយ៉ាងថ្លៃថ្នូ។
មិនស្រួល បោះឆ្នោតអាណត្តិក្រោយ គឺនៅតាចាញ់ហ៊ុនសែនដដែល  អោយតែមេរបស់គណបក្ស
ប្រឆាំងនៅតែជាមនុស្សមាត់ដាចអីចឹង?

On 9/17/08, Sam Rainsy Party-USA/Canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
>  September 16, 2008
>
>
> Excerpts from/translation of an article from Paris-based newspaper *
> Libération*,
> September 12, 2008.
>
> Full original article in French at http://tinyurl.com/6nnrcm
>
> * *
>
> * *
>
> *Cambodian legislative election was a big mess,*
>
> *Anything but a real election*
>
> * *
>
> *[Original title in French: Le "grand n'importe quoi" des législatives
> cambodgiennes]*
>
>
>
> *Vote tallies show in detail the extent of fraud in a poll that gave a
> landslide victory to the Cambodian People's Party (CPP).*
>
> * *
>
> Reading vote tallies related to Cambodia's July 27 legislative elections
> is breathtaking (…).
>
>
>
> *Grotesque.* In a vote tally seen by *Libération**,* one can notice, for
> instance, that there were 115 ballots cast at a polling station in the
> constituency of Prey Veng (in the south-eastern part of the country). But
> there is a little arithmetical problem: the document specifies that the CPP
> alone obtained 224 votes, versus 82 for the HRP and 72 for the SRP, which
> are the main opposition parties (Document # 1).
>
>
>
> [All the documents, with English translation, mentioned in this article can
> be read by clicking at http://tinyurl.com/6pzfc5]
>
>
>
> In even more grotesque proportions, the mistake repeats itself in the
> constituency of Kampong Speu (a province south-west of Phnom Penh): a vote
> tally sheet shows a total of 526 ballots cast. But, before reaching this
> total, it is written that the CPP has grabbed as many as 1,139 votes
> (Document # 2).
>
>
>
> Other vote tallies show how many votes each party has collected but without
> indicating the total number of valid votes cast at the corresponding polling
> stations (Document # 3), or they do not specify the number of registered
> voters at a specific polling station (Document # 4).
>
>
>
> [Sometimes, even worse, there are no indications whatsoever for both the
> total number of votes actually cast and the number of registered voters at a
> specific polling station (Document # 5)].
>
>
>
> Another frequent irregularity: a voter register lists twice [or even three
> times] the same name (Document # 6). Sometimes [in the same voter list for a
> given village or polling station], four voters are registered twice
> (Documents # 7 and # 8), etc.
>
>
>
> [The CPP used names of ghost voters and names of persons who are registered
> more than once, to issue forged voter identification documents to
> illegitimate voters to inflate the CPP votes. See reports on "1018 Forms" at
> http://tinyurl.com/5eo33w and http://tinyurl.com/57vdu8].
>
>
>
> [All the documents from # 1 to # 8, with English translation, mentioned in
> this article can be read by clicking at http://tinyurl.com/6pzfc5]
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to