On Feb 4, 3:01 am, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wednesday, February 4, 2009 Cambodians' freedom of speech has been
> destroyed by
> propaganda<http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/2009/02/cambodians-freedom-...>
> If we look back to KR's propaganda, current CPP's propaganda is the same. KR
> once was able to persuade huge Cambodian people to join their force through
> the accusing of American bombing. But it was a manipulation, it was a
> propaganda!
>
My friend,
Khmer Rouge has been the most nationalists Cambodians have ever had.
Unfortunately, they used it to the extreme, which eventually destroyed
their own nation instead.
The propaganda of KhmerRouge was correct. Many Cambodians have sold
their country to other nation. Norodom Sihanouk is a prime example.
You can tell what kind of leader he has been when you look at his flip
flop action.
> Now, Cambodian peoples are also manipulated by propaganda of CPP's members
> and their sympathizers. Whenever, they expressed their opposing ideas to the
> CPP's ideas, they are easily labeled as creating "division" inside Cambodian
> society. Cambodian people are still living under fear. At least three fears
> they are receiving everyday from CPP's propagandas through mass media such
> as 1. fear of civil war would happen again, 2. fear of internal division of
> their opposing ideas, and 3. fear of local authority who are spying them.
> Some Cambodian politicians stated that Cambodians are under three other
> fears: Khlao (unknown the reality), Khlean (poor and destitution), and
> Khlach (afraid of powerful CPP government). We cannot deny that Cambodia is
> controlled by fear or the climate of political fear.
>
It seems like you are a part of Sam Rainsy clan.
Sam Rainsy went so far to call his own people as Vietnamese to beg for
vote so he can become a prime minister. That is very wrong. Hun Sen,
Heng Samrin, Chea Sim etc.... are Cambodians, not Vietnamese. They may
have been working for Vietnam. Yet, they are Cambodians.
Sam Rainsy has never had the intention to work with those Cambodians
to better his country. His main purpose is his power and to destroy
others. That's how Cambodians have been doing. They fight each other
for their own individual power. They eliminate others. They have never
worked together for the interest of their whole nation. That's exactly
what Sam Rainsy and his clans have been doing.
Isn't that called division?
> But if we observe closely and use our deep concience, the "division"
> accusations are just the propaganda of CPP. For instance, Sam Rainsy who has
> been sharply criticized misbehaviors of some CPP's elites, and aftenly Sam
> Rainsy has been labeled as "division" provoker. How division by means and
> concepts they want to refer? Is it intellectually articulated? It is not
> intellectual at all, it is just a propaganda to silence the Cambodian
> peoeple from expressing their freedom of speech. Peoples have always
> expressed their diverse opinions in the free and democratic societies. So,
> different ideas don't exactly mean that there will be a division, but it is
> just a tool of development particularly the democracy development.
>
\
You have to remember that Sam Rainsy has been a part of that
government. He held a high position at one time. Can we call him a bad
guy too?
Sam Rainsy has been acting to divide his country for a very long time
when Cambodians badly need unity. Sam Rainsy has no power. Hun Sen
does. So Sam Rainsy would do anything to push Hun Sen out of power.
What is wrong with that? It is very wrong. Sam Rainsy has no intention
to join others with different views for a general causes for the
Cambodian people. He only care about his party and his view. So
fighting continues. Is that good for the country? Ofcourse, not.
Hence, Sam Rainsy is a party of division. Don't try to tell us
anything else. He lost big in the last election when the world deem to
label it as the best and fairest election in Cambodia.
The Cambodian people know now what division is. Sam Rainsy and his
clan will never win.
> In reality, though some time his speech is not relevant, Sam Rainsy has
> showed his courage and strong ideal to encourage Cambodian people to express
> and use their freedom of speech for the better of their lives and Cambodia.
> Sam Rainsy's speech cannot be ignorantly labeled as the cause of "division".
> In an intellectual idea, his idea is just a part of diversity of human
> being. Sam Rainsy's speech is not a cause of division leading to war or
> social chaos. Sam Rainsy himself has no weapons or armforce base to cause
> division at all. Now, all military power and police power are totally
> controlled by Hun Sen. Through recently armforce consolidation, what
> trajectory of Cambodia's future Hun Sen want to lead? Militarism,
> dictatorship, authoritorianism, or other types of predatory states?
>
We do admire for his courage to express his view. Yet, it still
doesn't change the fact that Sam Rainsy cannot reunite Cambodian
people for their common cause for the interest of the whole country.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
