Dear Sokha, I agree with you. However, those what so called opposition parties, 
have to receive this kind of medecine so they might wake up, and realized their 
stupidity, stop being so arrogant and willing to unite together.
 
KC
Khoar Chev ( Made in Cambodia )

--- On Fri, 6/12/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:


From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: [SAMRAINSYPARTY-For] My Analysis on Mr. Man Sonando
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 12:13 AM






In our world there are 2 categories of individual: 

1-A category of individual to make its name by crushing and lower to those 
around him to help him appear instead to recognize the efforts of others, 
instead of investing and make real sacrifices for the build it. One important 
way to appear quickly without too much effort. 

2 - Another category are those who invest,  makes more of sacrifice concentrate 
his efforts to support and encourage those around them to participate for a 
common goal. Building on a solid foundation is a slower but more secure. 

I hope that when this statement was presented, Sanando is not quite healthy, if 
so, Sanando should proudly present his excuses in public. If not, the 1st 
category of individuals seems compatible with his profile, and in addition, he 
is a person who simply misunderstanding, irresponsible acts assess without 
knowing the consequence of his act, the statement discussed in this forum will 
give more credit to those who are in the process of destroying our nation by 
trying to deny freedom and the right to speak of our people including Sanando 
himself. 

Note that I have no difficulty to see constructive criticism, which are present 
in order to make  correction  for our common good. 
But, I don't think that it's  intelligent to present the criticism pretending a 
frank one then use it to attack anyone, at any time and under any circumstance. 

An intelligent and responsible person, must be able to assess the consequence 
of his act. 
Best Regards,

Sokha Ly



2009/6/11 Kunthara Teav <[email protected]>






Hi Pretty,
 
The best thing for SRP just ignore and count Mr Sonando as an old confusing man 
he get lost by his frustration don't know what to do and where to go.
 
Best regards,
Thara Teav

--- On Thu, 6/11/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:


From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: [SAMRAINSYPARTY-For] My Analysis on Mr. Man Sonando
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 3:48 AM











-

From: PrettyMa <[email protected]>
Subject: [SAMRAINSYPARTY-For] My Analysis on Mr. Man Sonando
To: [email protected]
Cc: "Sichantha Ouk" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Mong Heng" 
<[email protected]>, "Lyaun Hay" <[email protected]>, "Ros Lida" 
<[email protected]>, [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], "Bolin 
Davith" <[email protected]>, "BUNKORN YUN" <[email protected]>, 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], "polo chun" 
<[email protected]>, "Naline Pea" <[email protected]>, [email protected], 
[email protected]
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 10:52 AM






Dear Colleagues & Friends,
 
I could not believe what I was listening to Mr. Mam Sonando last Monday night, 
June 8, 2009.  It was shocking to hear such a vicious personal attack 
against the Right Honourable Sam Rainsy and the party by a man whom I thought 
to be somewhat patriotic.  I was once thought of him rather highly, although I 
never really get a chance to meet or hear him.  He disappointed me big time.   
What is he trying achieve in using his broadcasting facility to blitz attacks 
on the official opposition when the country is in need of  one?  In the 
interest of whom or what parties he was trying to do? 
 
Mr. Sonando's choices of words were really poor and sounded childish at 
time.  He pretended to be intelligent, a lot more than Sam Rainsy as he 
called our leader "Akvichea" (uneducated).   As his personal attack went on you 
began to realize how shallow his arguments were, unsupportable, short-sighted, 
and they showed his tremendous lack of judgment and ability to think critically 
on issue as complex as Cambodian politics.  
 
He did not understood the failure of some major parties that came before Sam 
Rainsy, including many over the years.  Who and what parties benefit most 
from this attack on SRP?  And is that part of overall  solutions he wanted to 
offer country on what he proclaimed to be a winning solution?   When the 
country is in dire need of a unifying nationalisitic forces, he chose to do the 
opposite.  It is mind boggling.
 
What he was offering to the listeners was something more like Alice from the 
Wonderland -  rosy, uncomplecated, matters that  he think he can solve by 
bringing all little parties into one.  Just like that, done.  He didn't 
understand the human behavioural aspect to the game, including  all 
the leaders/players involved. He overlooked importan factor such as the 
disappearance of KNLP, or the broken Funcinpec/Rannaridh party which almost got 
wiped out from past election.  Did he ever understand that there are men 
who think less of  the nation, but only thirst for personal power and a quick 
rich scheme?  Just look around he will find plenty, including some who has gone 
into retirement, already.  Furthermore, he forgot that the CPP is loaded with 
cash, tree's money, donours, loans, crooked businessmen, radios, TVs, so the 
playing field is not at the same level.  We managed to do do well despite all 
the odds stacked up against us, included
 impulsive yet unrealistic mindede people like Mr. Mam.
 
As for the 50+1 formula, he could have better understood the significant of 
that strategy going forward.   He should dig deep into the roots of the 
Cambodian political problems, understood the players's characters and their 
past and present behaviours.   The jiggling for position, posts, 
re-alignment here and there not on principles or values, but on personal 
gain.   
 
Let's  look at all the mess our country has been in since a coalition gov't was 
created, Funcinpec/CPP, and what exactly good came out of their perfect 
marriage?   Look at the last general election, the marriage still stand despite 
of all the up and down between the two.  Without the 50+1 formula, you can be 
sure that CPP and Funcinpec will continue to loot the country for ever.  He 
could have seen that coming easily.  Another missing fact.  
 
But now, the country has a real choice.  It is down to two formidable 
parties.   For the first time, we  provide  Cambodia and our people a real 
alternative  to the CPP-ruling party.  As for Mr. Mam, he should embrace 
this concept with a nationalistic sense of urgency by being a REALIST, not by 
trying to destroy a credible party which has built itself successfully over the 
span of 15 years or so.   It takes time to plant, water and grow - to build 
trust and to know who your friends are.  We have grown and continue to grow 
despite the fact that many circumstances set against us.  We ran against a big 
money vote-buying machine, the CPP.
 
What Mr. Mam Sonando should be doing in his capacity is to use his talent and 
his supposedly love for the country  to help enhancing people's knowledge and 
understanding of how democracy works in practicality, in a country such as 
America or Canada.  He should encourage people to think of how a system of 
check-an-balance works, and what people need to do or reflect in order to 
improve or having one.  He should talk about getting people involved in the 
political process and how to go about doing it.  He can not dream of having a 
democracy like USA when he did not understand the fact that Cambodia is not 
USA, nor the process of democracy has taken roots as yet.   He should be 
realistic and be more thoughtful by help encouraging all the tiny disgruntle 
parties to rally behind a us in order to grow and win together, to offset the 
balance of power and to keep democracy moving forward from where it was and 
what it is now.  He should not use his
 personal forum and radio station to attack an nationalist force and in this 
case a very formidable and yet official opposition party.  In my opinion, he 
did not do himself, nor his countrymen any favour by being unti-nationalists 
when the country is in need of a stronger opposition to the current regime.
 
Unfortunately,  since he is and never has been a leader of any political party, 
it is understandable for the way he argued his case.   However, one fine day in 
hindsight he will get to appreciate what this party has done, what it stands 
for and what it aims to achieve in its quest for  forever justice, freedoms and 
liberty for all Cambodians, inside as well as abroad.   As long as people like 
Mr. Mam Sonando continues to be unrealistic of their view and political 
practices, then the road to freedoms and democratic reforms will be 
somewhat hindered than we would actually like to see.  But, we will move on as 
a movement of hope and change.
 
I wish that our dear Mam Sonando  remains neutral, politically realistic and 
engage in a forum of more or less unifying, not the way he conducted himself on 
the air on that Monday.   He is more than a man to many ordinary Cambodians, 
and  I do wish to see him stay above his poor phrases and judgment for the 
betterment of all people, including Mr. Mam Sonando, himself.   
 
I still hope.
 
Truly Yours,
Pretty
 
  







Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the grill. 




      
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to