On Aug 13, 6:47 am, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> Vietnam's disgusting
> strategy<http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/2009/08/vietnams-disgusting...>
>
> If Cambodians younger generations and patriotic leaders/elitists don't
> understand the strategy of annexing Cambodia by Vietnam, our future and
> territorial land will be in the same destiny like Champa, Prey Norkor,
> Kampuchea Krom and Lao.
>
My friend,
Vietnamese intention to annex Cambodia to something may be true.
However, it is the Cambodian people who must act for their own future
and the future of their own country. We are talking about Cambodains
over all, not just a group or groups of people. CPP people are
Cambodians too.
Cambodians have weaken their own country by fighting each other for
power among themselves in their own country for a very long time. We
can see that sign her with many people talkiing abot the love of their
country. Unfortunately, they all are dividing their own nation. They
think that their party is the right one while others are the wrong
ones. And they promote it that way. This is a serious matter when we
talk about defending a nation. They must be together in order to make
country strong. Unfortunately, Cambodians are not that way. They think
about their own rightiousness for their own indifiduality or groups.
They think about power so they can suppress others. We have seen it
from one generation to another, from one regime to another. They all
are thirsty for power. Their country integrity is not their number one
defense.
Vietnam probably can take over Cambodia in about a week.
Thailand probably can take over Cambodian in about a month.
Cambodia has very little defense for themselves today because they are
busy fighting each other. They are still trying to find their own
identity.
> It is so shocked that only in the Cambodia in this world that a leader has
> praised the foreigner of helping their country liberated from this or from
> that without weighing the
> truth<http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2009/08/vietnam-truly-helped-liberate-ca...>
> .
Why is it so shock to you?
Do you know who destroy Cambodia the most?
You are right. Cambodians have been destroying their own nation in the
last five decades with or without the help of other nation.
I don't know about you. Vietnamese invasion stopped the killings
committed by the Khmer Rouge. Who are the Khme Rouge? Ofcourse, they
are a faction of the Cambodian people. It took an invasion of other
nation to stop it. How bad can it be?
>
> Hun Sen is a politician, but he learned nothing about the trick and treat of
> politics. He is deserved to be a very good lackey to Vietnam. In this world,
> academically speaking, is there any one who said "the aggression of Vietnam
> is to help Cambodia"?
>
Do you know that Cambodia is where it is today due to Hun Sen
leadership whether you like it or not?
Do you know that Cambodia today is at peace, which is the product of
Hun Sen leadership whether you like it or not?
Cambodians should not take this good thing as their set back because
someone think that they could not have done better. That's right.
"could not have done" is just a matter of thinking or dreaming. It has
passed. If Cambodians really want to move forward, they should start
from where it is and try to change it for better future. Could have
done this or that is just a talk.
> No one.
>
> Only Hun Sen did say this without understanding the cost benefit Vietnam has
> been investing in Cambodia. For the international relations, political
> scientists have never seen any country has given something as a "free shit"
> to another countries. They only work to benefit their own countries. In this
> matter, Vietnam is kind to Cambodia to liberate Cambodia from Khmer Rouge
> freely?
>
Sam Rainsy has been trying to convince the Cambodian people to think
this way. The majority of the people don't believe him. They know that
their country has been better than it has been for a very long time.
They don't want to loose it. They don't want to fight each other
anylonger. That's why Sam Rainsy and his party have gone no where.
They are loosing their support everyday. Many people would come and
say that they are intimidated to do that. They may have been. Yet,
they still can't find their way to support Sam Rainsy because he is
promoting division.
> Yes, if Hun Sen wants to challenge with me and tell the truth to all
> Cambodians and the world, let both of us debate on the TV channel together,
> not only you who is shamelessly admiring foreigner without listening to
> others or televising others. This is only the act of an ignorant leader and
> dictatorial characteristic. Cambodia will be easily died by this one-sided
> mass media.
>
My friend,
Hun Sen is not going to challenge with you. He has the power whether
you like it or not.
Hun Sen may be a bad leader. Yet, he is not going to debate no one who
challenge his power.
He is not going to let go his power any time soon whether you like it
or not, or whether it's right or wrong. Your talk or request to
challenge him will be just that. Hun Sen doesn't even care to listen
to you or even think about it.
The same thing applies to Mu who was trying to challenge Hun SEn
power. He is not going to let it go. Actually you have seen it
already. He has found his way to destroy her. Whether it's right or
wrong, he could do it. So Mu put herself in position to LOOSE.
> In century of successful Vietnam in expanding its territorial land, Vietnam
> has never said that it has invaded Champa, Prey Norkor, Khmer Krom or Lao.
> It has clearly stated that it helped those people in those territorial land.
> Those patriotic leaders in those lands have never praised Vietnam of giving
> free shit at all. But why they accepted that hegemony and domination power
> because they have no claw or power to rise up to fight against Vietnam. They
> have been absolutely cornered by Vietnam through a "cold blood" strategy.
> Vietnam has used a very intellectual strategy to murder those people without
> bleeding. For instance, any one dare to tell to the world that "Lao is free
> from Vietnam?". If your answer is yes, it is not different from Kampuchea
> Krom during last 70 or 80 years, no one said that Kampuchea Krom was under
> Vietnam. But nowadays, we can see Vietnam's strategy of "kill without
> bleeding" as important evidence for us to the land of Champa, Prey Norkor,
> Kampuchea Krom and Lao.
>
Remember1 Kampuchea krom is VIETNAMESE TERRITORY, not Cambodian land.
> Champa, Prey Norkor, Kampuchea Krom, Lao and next is Cambodia inevitably.
> This land will be died through two effective tactics of Vietnam:
>
This is the history of Cambodia. Today, territory and boundry are
clear that it's not that history.
The history is just a history.
If Cambodians don't want to loose what they have today, they should
think about their own country and their own people. They would think
about being together so others cannot invade. Look at Israel. They
defend their tiny nation with the will of the people. Cambodians can't
even do that. Cambodians can only open their mouth for the history and
cry to be victimized by something. They are crying about loosing their
land instead of defending them. They destroy and weaken their own
nation while they are crying for the potential loss of their nation.
What kind of proplle are they?
> - 1. Create a puppet government that is working under the supervision of
> their disguising special advisers and armforce such as the policemen,
> secret
> military group, and civil special agents etc. Politically, Vietnam has
> successful projected a stage for power competition and it helps behind to
> push up those who are honest to them. This strategy is called "borrowing
> your knife to temporarily use" or "kchey kombet prer bondos ason".
>
It doesn't matter what you label the government of Cambodia today. It
doesn't matter how they run it. They have brought the country to where
it is today. Many Cambodians are proud of that.
The majoirty of Cambodians don't want to hafe more war. They know
their country can be better. Yet, they don't want division. They want
to promote democracy. Yet they don't want to destroy one another for
it. Khmer Rouge was bigger than life when they first liberated their
own country with their vicgtory over Lon Nol regime. Then they turn
their back toward their own people. Now, Sam Rainsy is saying the same
thing. Yet he is promoting division.
> - 2. Flood Vietnamese population into that land. Currently, Lao land is
> free land for all Vietnamese to live and enjoy life over there. Lao has the
> border of land with Vietnam, but Lao has no border of citizenship and
> territorial power. Every section of the government is co-administered by
> disguising Vietnamese. Military and policemen in Lao are Vietnamese.
>
Do you know how many Cambodians had run into Thailand?\
Do you know what Thailand has done to them?
There are alot of people are living in Cambodia illegally. And the
Cambodian people are doing nothing. Should we blame Vietnam or others
for no action of the Cambodian society?
Anyone on earth would do it too when it makes the lives better. That's
how human being act.
Cambodian refugees ran to Thailand for that.
Vietnamese boat people risked their lives for that.
Pethaps many of you are in that category.
Should Thailand blame Cambodia for that?
> <http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_jVCbxaOxjhA/SoQUWqWWLJI/AAAAAAAAASs/LWXdVRZ...>
> Lao is opening its door for foreign investments such as from the US or
> China, but where those tax and benefit go to? The powerful leader right? Who
> are those powerful leaders in Lao? They are disguising Vietnamese as Laos.
> It is common to see Lao people who are incredibly bi-lingual speaker: they
> can speak both Lao and Vietnamese fluently. The physical land is Lao but the
> wealth of the nation and spirit is not Lao.
>
Cambodians have been enjoying that kind of investrment for a very long
time now. They may not have received all or the majority of it due to
corruption and extortion. Yet, they still received some. It is just a
matter of making the system better.
> In the world history of invasion, the real independent countries have never
> mentioned about their both brutal past and liberation past. Germany has
> stopped talking about the Nazi brutality and the helping from the alliance
> led by the US.
>
In the Cambodian case, it took an invasion to stop the killing of
their own people in their own country. How sad can it be?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
