On Aug 14, 2:43 am, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> How do you see there are absolute dichotomy of CPP and SRP? For the
> sake of Cambodia, Hun Sen and his CPP's teamworks have to pay
> gratitude to SRP and their supporters who are sacrifying for the true
> development of Cambodia.
>
Are you telling or suggesting us that SRP lead Cambodia for the
development in Cambodia, and CPP took the credit?
Please tell us what role of SRP in Cambodian governance has been in
the last three decades.
What did SRP do for the development of Cambodia?
Are you suggesting that CPP has no role in that?
Please explain it to me. I am very confused.
> While CPP's members are joyful with luxurious cars, villas and
> dollars, most of SRP's activists are poor and fighting from their
> heart. If you compare both of them, who are loving their nation than?
So the rich are not lovers of the nation?
Are only poor people really love Cambodia?
Remember what Khmer Rouge had said all along during their fights to
liberate Cambodia.
They said the same thing. The rich suppress the poor. It meant that
the rich were enemies to the people. So they made those idiots as
leaders of the country. They lead people to death. They brought
Cambodia to ground zero. Is that what you are talking about?
> CPP's members are loving dollars, srey, sra and lbaeng. SRP's
> activists are loving justice, equality and genuine democracy.
>
Are you telling us that poor people don't like any of those things?
Oh are you suggesting that SRP's activists are not loving those
things?
Thank you for telling us that SRP members are activists. Mu showed
that clearly when she brought her lawsuit ahead against Hun Sen.
Ordinary person would not have done it when there is no real
evidence.
Don't tell us that only SRP loves justice, equality and genuine
democracy.
All Cambodians do.
Think about what you are saying. Don't you agree that you like part of
Cambodia and hate another part?
My friend, you are preaching SRP division practices. Sam Rainsy has
lead his people to do that for a very long time. He would never get my
support. He is not a good leader for Cambodia. He is not a product for
Cambodia.
> Give me a break from your spit-over argument.
>
Oh1 So you only take the argument that give you the benefits?
You are wrong. Your argument won't help you because you have useless
talk.
If you do, you would have come out with real concrete evidence to
support yourself.
Mu didn't think of that, that was why she is loosing.
Hearsay is nothing more than just a hearsay.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
