Someone stating a claim should provide evidence to support it.
Any reasonable person would immediately conclude that it is not
sufficient to say " Proofs will be very hard to provide”.


On Oct 5, 12:15 am, [email protected] wrote:
> You are right again,
>
> Those who are experts in fighting the communists are now working for them.  
> Even politicians are alibis for the communists, too, aren't they?
>
> Get your expertise out and explain, so the all idiots who are not experts  
> in fighting the communists can learn.
>
> Go ahead. Just don't raise your white flag and work for them like the  
> so-called experts in Phnom Penh.
> =========
>
> In a message dated 10/4/2009 11:42:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
>
> [email protected] writes:
>
> ពួកយើងអ្នកជំនាន់ថ្មី ដែលស្គាល់កុំមុយនីស  
> នៅមិនទាន់មានឱកាស់ធ្វើនយោបាយនៅឡើយទេ ។  
> តែពួកអ្នកមានឱកាស់គឺ​សុទ្ធតែជាមនុស្សធុនដូចលោក ។  
> បើបានក្លាយជាជនភៀសខ្លួនហើមានមនៈសិការជាជនភៀសខ្លួន  
> ស្រលាញ់លទ្ធិសេរី​ប្រឆាំងកុំមុយនីស នោះមិនអីទេ  
> តែបែជាយកនាមជាជនភៀសខ្លួនមកបន្លំជួយពួកកុំមុយនីសវិញ ទើបជាបញ្ហា ។
>
> អ្នកជំនាន់ថ្មីនៅក្នុងស្រុក​ខំសង្ឈឹមអ្នកក្រៅស្រុក  
> តែបើអ្នក្រៅស្រុកមានខួក្បាលថោកលក់ខួបំរើ​ពួកកុំមុយនីសវិ
> ញ​ធុនដូចសព្វថ្ងៃនេះ​តើធ្វើយ៉ាងណារំដោះស្រុកពីយួនរួច?
>
> ក្រុមកន្សែងសរ
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 7:45 PM, <[email protected]_
>
> (mailto:[email protected]) >  wrote:
>
> You are right, I don't know the communists' tricks nor do I know the  
> so-called non-communists' deceptions, that's why I lost to both  sides and 
> became
> a refugee. What can I say?
>
> I wonder why those who claim they know all communist tricks and yet  they
> are still losers. Many of them end up working with and for the  communists
> licking their feet.
>
> Why don't you, the expert, explain?
> =============
>
> In a message dated 10/4/2009 10:22:55 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>
> [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  writes:
>
> លោក​ឈឹម,​ដូច្នោះកុំអួតថា​លោកទៅស្រុកខ្មែរបានបីបួនខែម
> ុនបោះឆ្នោតហើយដឹងនយោបាយស្រុកខ្មែរបាន​ច្រើននោះ  
> តាមពិតលោកមិនទាំងដឹងដឹងពីល្បិចកល់កុំមុយនីសផង ។  
> ប្រហែលជាលោករស់នៅស្រុកអាមេរិកយូពេកហើយ​បានជាលោកមិនស្គាល់ពីល្បិចដ
> ែលកុំមុយនីសវាយបំបែក  ង្នកប្រឆាំងកុំមុយនីស ។
>
> បើលោកមើលរឿងនេះមិនយល់ទេ មានន័យថា លោកនៅរាក់ណាស់
> ដូច្នោះត្រូវខំបន្តទៀត  កុំអាលអួតខ្លួនថាជាអ្នក​នយោបាយអី
> ខ្មាស់គេ​ព្រោះសូមប្បីក្មេងរៀននៅឆ្នាំទី១  
> នៃមហាវិទ្យាល័យ​នៅស្រុកខ្មែរក៏គេដឹងរឿងនេះ
> និងយល់រឿងនេះច្បាស់ជាងលោកដែរ  ។
>
> ក្រុមកន្សែងសរ
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:32 PM, <[email protected]_
>
> (mailto:[email protected]) > wrote:
>
> If Kem Sos is siding with Hun Sen how can we explain this pro-cpp  
> newspapers attack on Kem Sos and Poly Sam?:
>
> _http://www.dap-news.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=...
> itueugasiuesri-s-dmrigabykcegyretaamg&catid=38:article_
> (http://www.dap-news.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=...
> igabykcegyretaamg&catid=38:article)
>
> Why did Hun Sen complain? What game are they playing?
> =============
>
> In a message dated 10/2/2009 1:29:49 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>
> [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  writes:
>
> RADIO FREE ASIA UNDER KEM SOS’S  WATCH
>
> Radio Free Asia’s under Kem Sos’s watch was  leaning toward Hun Sen
> government.
>
> <!--[if  !supportLists]-->1.    <!--[endif]-->Ratha, a political activist
> and his  association, witnessed the
> slide  down of Radio Free Asia under Kem Sos watch from information radio
> to  an opinion radio, even worst, RFA under Kem Sos became a partisan  radio,
> pro-Hun Sen’s government.
>
> Ratha petitioned the RFA stirring committee  telling them that RFA now
> becoming opinion radio instead of  information radio. RFA stirring committee
> chief asked Ratha to provide  proofs. If your proofs are convincing we can
> right what was wrong  doing.
>
> Proofs will be very hard to provide because  Cambodian people are by nature
> very nice.  Cambodian people don=E  2t want to bother anyone;  Cambodian
> just wants to live alone and let live.
>
> So we are not organized to get proof to  convict someone. Rumors stated
> that Kem Sos was always well received  as a VIP by Hun Sen officials every 
> time
> he went to Cambodia and even  Kem Sos had bragged to his RFA colleagues in
> his Washington DC office  that he owned a dozen hectares of land in Phnom
> Penh which valued  several million of dollars.  But we never got proofs of any
> of  this.
>
> =0 A  
> <!--[if  !supportLists]-->2.    <!--[endif]-->Months had passed. In 2008,
> the CPP, Kem Sos,  Sam Borin and Mayarith the three pro-CPP RFA journalist
> committed  fatal errors. They provided by themselves the rope to hang them
> all.  It was their fall from the RFA pedestal.
>
> <!--[if  !supportLists]-->3.    <!--[endif]-->Mayarith and two other RFA
> journalists visited  Cambodia during their summer times break. At Phnom Penh
> Mayarith was  well received by Interior ministry. Phnom Penh Municipality
> Police  assigned him a police car to transport him everywhere as he pleased.  
> At that time, the driver was Mayarith. Arrived a little late to cross  the
> Mekong River at Neak Loeung, he used his privilege of Police VIP  to stop the
> ferryboat and transport his car to cross the Mekong.  Because of nervous
> pressure, Mayarith car hit another car already  packed in the ferryboat.
> Mayarith was very angry against the other  accidental car owner/driver. 
> Mayarith
> used his handcuffs to cuff the  other accidental car owner who was scared to
> death and fled very fast  far away. Mayarith yelled to ferryboat employees
> that his is a Police  officer and all the ferry employees must help him to
> arrest the  offending driver.
>
> The question is:  Why did Mayarith have  the handcuffs?  Why did Mayarith
> use the Police power to cuff  other people? Maybe, Mayarith is a CPP secrete
> Police Officer? That  was the proof the RFA chief needs to remove Mayarith
> from his position  RFA journalist reporter. You don’t hear him anymore on RFA
>  broadcast.
>
> <!--[if  !supportLists]-->4.    <!--[endif]-->Heng Vong Bun Chhat, a Law Ph
> D., lawyer of  Hun Sen’s government cursed a VOA journalist who has the
> audacity to  ask him by phone from his Washington DC office some thorny
> question  about the corruption of Cambodia Law School.  The VOA journalist  
> asked
> him to comment about the rumor of corruption:  Each=2  0Cambodia Law School
> alumnae have to pay $30,000 to be appointed as  magistrate in the Court of
> Justice of Cambodia.
>
> Heng Vong Bun Chhat insulted and cursed the  VOA journalist; you look down
> at us Cambodia because you are backed up  by a super power and you insult
> us; you’re arrogant and coward.   Dare you to come here in Phnom Penh, I’ll
> show you what we’re capable  to do. You too young, you don’t know how to
> work with other  people.  Ask Samborin.  He is the only one to know how to  
> work with us.  That was the proof the RFA Chief wants to move  Samborin to a
> modest position without power in RFA Washington DC  Office. You don’t hear him
> anymore on RFA broadcast.
>
> <!--[if  !supportLists]-->5.    <!--[endif]-->On Preah Vihear
> Thailand-Cambodia dispute,  Samborin interviewed Sean Pense for thirty 
> minutes and Hun
> Sen  government officials for also thirty minutes. But when Samborin edited  
> his news in RFA broadcasting, the public can hear Sean Pengse opinion  only
> for a few minutes while Hun Sen official spoke non-sense for  thirty minutes.
> Sean Pengse don’t want no more to be interviewed by  Samborin who played
> the game for Hun Sen’s governments.  
>
> <!--[if  !supportLi sts]-->6.    <!--[endif]-->A week ago some RFA
> journalists demonstrated  against their lay off. RFA Washington DC officials 
> knew so
> well that  the RFA journalists in RFA Phnom Penh office, the majority, were
> Kem  Sos’s people and pro-CPP. To avoid some legal problem relative to the  
> lay-off, Washington DC officials chose to wait until the expiration of  
> their contract. It was not Kem Sos who laid off his protégés Phnom  Penh
> journalists. It was the expiration of their contracts which ended  the RFA 
> Phnom
> Penh jobs of Kem Sos protégés.  Kem  Sos would never lay off his own people.
>
> So=2 0Washington DC officials would like to  wait until the end of their
> contract. When their contracts were all  expired, the Washington officials
> thanked them all, and did not renew  their contract to let them
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to