On Feb 3, 4:45 pm, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > It is usual for Mr.Sourn who has always pursued his meddling political > activity. Sam Rainsy's act should be praised and the government has to > give three thumbs for their inability to face with Vietnam in a broad > public. >
Please explain to us why people should praise Sam Rainsy. His leadership has nothing more than protesting against anything that is not his. On the border demarcation, Sam Rainsy has done more wrong for himself and his followers. As a leader, this kind of problem should be resolved diplomatically. If it didn't work to your advantage and you persist that it is wrong, then Sam Rainsy's act perhaps is a meaningful one. However, it is still a protest against the ruling party. What does it mean to Sam Rainsy? Ofcourse, he is going to loose because he has no power but a small voice hoping that others would come to his side. Let us be clear on this one. Who would come to defend Sam Rainsy on this particular matter? None. Perhaps, many have come already to sympathize with him. That's about it. His voice is nothing more than a gathering of support. In the future, this support will translate into money for something. For Sam Rainsy? Answer it foryourself. At the end, Sam Rainsy is going to loose. The border demarcation is going to go on. The people are going to loose their land. And the ruling is happy hunky dunky. So Sam Rainsy is nothing. > While Hun Sen is dealing with Thailand, it is right for Cambodia to > have Sam Rainsy to face with Vietnam. > What does Sam Rainsy have to deal with Vietnam? He has no power to do anything. A little power that he has means nothing to many function of government. Sam Rainsy perhaps is not allowed to participate in any negotiation. They have put him at a place where he can bark to a few people within a confine area. Sam Rainsy had nothing to go by. That was why he decided to go against the law with his few cronies. Who are loosing? A few villagers have been jailed. Sam Rainsy and his party are laughing from a distance. Sam Rainsy is living comfortably in France. This is the movement of Sam Rainsy. He is now at his core supporters, the overseas Cambodians. That's where he gets the money. The Cambodian people don't have that for him. Escpecially during a crisis, Sam Rainsy abandon them quickly for his own safety. What kind of leadership is that? > Let unify together all cambodians. Let me understand you right. You said:" LET UNIFY TOGETHER ALL CAMBODIANS." Am I hearing it right that you are preaching unification among all Cambodians? Or are you trying to unifying Sam Rainsy people instead. Which on is the correct meaning of the sentence above? Please tell us. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
