What is your main idea? ...To divide Hun Sen and Sam Rainsy from each other and eliminate eventually?
- Sam Rainsy has done great thing to protect the border land - What is the rule of law of the powerful? KY On Feb 5, 6:34 am, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 3, 4:45 pm, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It is usual for Mr.Sourn who has always pursued his meddling political > > activity. Sam Rainsy's act should be praised and the government has to > > give three thumbs for their inability to face with Vietnam in a broad > > public. > > Please explain to us why people should praise Sam Rainsy. > His leadership has nothing more than protesting against anything that > is not his. > On the border demarcation, Sam Rainsy has done more wrong for himself > and his followers. As a leader, this kind of problem should be > resolved diplomatically. If it didn't work to your advantage and you > persist that it is wrong, then Sam Rainsy's act perhaps is a > meaningful one. However, it is still a protest against the ruling > party. What does it mean to Sam Rainsy? Ofcourse, he is going to loose > because he has no power but a small voice hoping that others would > come to his side. > Let us be clear on this one. Who would come to defend Sam Rainsy on > this particular matter? None. Perhaps, many have come already to > sympathize with him. That's about it. His voice is nothing more than a > gathering of support. In the future, this support will translate into > money for something. For Sam Rainsy? Answer it foryourself. > At the end, Sam Rainsy is going to loose. The border demarcation is > going to go on. The people are going to loose their land. And the > ruling is happy hunky dunky. > So Sam Rainsy is nothing. > > > While Hun Sen is dealing with Thailand, it is right for Cambodia to > > have Sam Rainsy to face with Vietnam. > > What does Sam Rainsy have to deal with Vietnam? > He has no power to do anything. A little power that he has means > nothing to many function of government. Sam Rainsy perhaps is not > allowed to participate in any negotiation. They have put him at a > place where he can bark to a few people within a confine area. > Sam Rainsy had nothing to go by. That was why he decided to go against > the law with his few cronies. Who are loosing? > A few villagers have been jailed. Sam Rainsy and his party are > laughing from a distance. > Sam Rainsy is living comfortably in France. > This is the movement of Sam Rainsy. > He is now at his core supporters, the overseas Cambodians. That's > where he gets the money. The Cambodian people don't have that for him. > Escpecially during a crisis, Sam Rainsy abandon them quickly for his > own safety. What kind of leadership is that? > > > Let unify together all cambodians. > > Let me understand you right. You said:" LET UNIFY TOGETHER ALL > CAMBODIANS." > Am I hearing it right that you are preaching unification among all > Cambodians? > Or are you trying to unifying Sam Rainsy people instead. > Which on is the correct meaning of the sentence above? > Please tell us. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
