Dear Kangaroo, What is the answer ?
I knew you would say this,"The answer is that you are attacking one's personality because you could not face the truth of the Cambodian people. You are proving really good on what I have been saying. Cambodians would turn to attack a personality when they cannot face the truth of their own. You are not the only one who came out to defend something that is undefensiveable." Just in case you are not noticing. This is the same aggressive techniques you have been practicing and imposing to others in this online community. See how annoying it is. I know that you could not possibly give the answer and I insist that you give me an answer just make sure you understand what you have done to others. Because what I want is specificity in your answer to which I know you do not have. Kangaroo, I think I have proved my point. Stop claiming that you are a victim of personal attacks. You, on the other hand, have been attacking the Cambodian people and culture for a very long time. This is why I decided to stand up and confronting you. >From this point forward, I will drop the issue. Please know that we are not perfect. Mistakes in life or in politics could be lessons for progress if we learned from our mistakes. Thank you for being a good sport and a wonderful debating partner. Respectfully yours, Jay On Oct 24, 11:56 am, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 23, 11:39 am, Jayakhmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Kangaroo, > > > Saying the answer is obvious is not the answer. Give me your precise > > answer or admit that you are just blowing hot air about Khmer people > > and Khmer culture. > > If I blew hot air about Cambodian people, why can't you come out with > credible cool air of the Cambodian people? > Instead, you turn around to discuss about me personally instead. > Can you explain it to me on it? > > > It is very typical Kangaroo behavior to dodging a real question and > > respond with this obscure and vague answer while pretending to be all > > self righteous and spitting hollow rhetoric about Cambodian people is > > this or Cambodian behavior is that . Don't go anywhere else just > > stick to this topic. > > OK! Read the above paragraph. And let us believe that it is all true > for the moment. > > Can you tell yourself what you are talking about in this paragraph? > > You are right again. You are proving my view even more. You are > attacking one's personality here. Don't you see it? > This is the very typical Cambodian behavior. We have seen it > repeatedly here. We see it all the time in the Cambodian society. No > wonder Cambodians are still fighting each other in their own country. > > > What is your answer? > > The answer is that you are attacking one's personality because you > could not face the truth of the Cambodian people. > You are proving really good on what I have been saying. Cambodians > would turn to attack a personality when they cannot face the truth of > their own. You are not the only one who came out to defend something > that is undefensiveable. > > > I thank you kindly for your response in advance. > > You really don't have to thank you. I should thank you for proving my > statement. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
