I think what you have tried write very long below is out of topic we have debated. This might be a smart way you have tried to do in here.
However, your theory of criticizing and dividing the concept of Khmer, Kampuchea and Cambodia is useless and it is provocative for misunderstanding and dividing among Khmer. Your analysis has not been useful for Cambodian people as whole at all. However, continue your writing and I will learn from you more then. KY On Dec 24, 12:24 pm, Neak Kampuchea <[email protected]> wrote: > Khmer young > So you believe that right now Vietnam is Controling Cambodia? OK, I am > wrong. > I just want to say: All men are created equal, with freedom of > expression, and freedom to believe. > > This human right is impose by nature, if you are Budhhist or by God if > you are Christian. But either way is alway right. > > Please look at this: > > Khmer nation itself has been creating Khmer culture extremism and > corruption with impunity, thousand years before Mr. Hen Sen’s birth > date. > > Please be understood that Cambodian is not a race as certain > individual has thought. One should thinks this English word meaning is > not the same as Khmer language, which has not been adjusted for > decades along with social evolution or in others words along with > multi-ethnic integration. > > Every English word we speak has been up dated. So please be careful to > catch-up this English word Cambodian, which is designated for all > inhabitants within Cambodia, without discriminating of Khmer or other > origins of birth, races, sex, color, belief, and political tendency, > but not exceeding to be illegally added with Khmer ethnic of Vietnam > and Khmer ethnic of Thailand. Cambodian is nominated for people, only > within Cambodia’s legal boundary. > > The Cambodian constitution, it self, has truly been creating Khmer > extremist movement, culture of corruption and impunity due to Khmer > extreme religious nationalism with misjudgment for Cambodian > sustainable social evolution stability. > > Look, Cambodia is the official name of the country, its inhabitants > should be called Cambodian, which is none relevance for Khmer > citizen? > > Now, please examine Sam Rainsy’s party and Rong Chhun’s union worker > leader; they do politics in the name of Khmer in the constitution, > which has some English words mistranslated into Khmer clause: “We the > people of Cambodia are Khmer citizen” in place of Cambodian citizen. > (Pulrath-Kampuchea or Chun-Kampuchea). These two men, their teams and > Ms.Musochea have never called Cambodian people in Khmer word Chun- > Kampuchea as Mr. Hun Sen did. > > This is the reason why there is extremist Khmer movement that has been > pushing thousand and thousand Khmer Krom of Vietnam and Khmer Surin of > Thailand to coming to Phnom Penh for claiming their Khmer citizenship, > because they said they are also Khmer like the others in the country. > And no doubt, there is a strong support from SRP and Union leader Rong > Chhun for their political gain. > > This potential problem will last, and has extended to make Cambodian > instability threat, until some day Cambodian Government will > understand and decide a decisive reform those malicious constitutional > clauses, in which there is democracy principal flaw as “all human are > created equal with freedom of expression. > . > Mr. Hen Sen knows all of that, but he thinks this is not the time yet, > until next young Cambodian generations will become more educated as > needed in the majority Cambodian. > > For now, he and his government official have a full power to > unconstitutionally cross over, order of doing anything and calling all > Cambodian in Khmer word,”Chun-kampuchea” as for teaching ahead of the > time needed, and also expressing a willingness for avoiding > discrimination of origin of birth of all inhabitants in Cambodia in > the face of UN human right, NGO groups, domestic and oversea Cambodian > as well. This is what, CPP is doing about. > > We the people of Cambodia need Constitutional reform for replacing old > version > “Khmer citizen” by a new description” Cambodian citizen” for relevance > to the countries name Cambodia. > > 1-We the people of Cambodia are “Cambodian citizens”. > 2-The government of Cambodia is from Cambodian for Cambodian. > 3-The state is separated from religion, which is belonging solely > to the people. > > If religion continues to belong to the state, Cambodia could never be > able to alleviate poverty and corruption, which has been invisibly > rising and legally hiding behind the power of Cambodian government > itself. > > Believe or not, except to you, but please try to take a look as the > following: > > If one of ministers, one provincial governor, one state or a > provincial prosecutor, or just a district councilor president or > national assembly president, or senator president, will plan to do for > example: Kathenatien, Haih-Phkar, Kanben, or Acpisech preah, the whole > staff under the one who does one of those religious ceremonies, must > be serenely forced to put some money for taking part with theirs big > bosses, not for belief season, but instead as loyalty for keeping > their job security. > > As Cambodia has no “none-profit organization laws” to ruler over every > association > (An association is a group of two or more persons, who get involve in > any business) in the country, who is going to dare asking for > transparency and accountability? So what is about the big amount of > money they has collected? > > If the same boss will do one ceremony two or three time a year, their > staffs need two or three times money input lost, perhaps the total > amount is enough for buying clothes needed the whole year for their > children. > > How about military and police generals, or Commanders, who controls > thousand soldiers, or thousand police officers? Are they done same > religious ceremonies like civilian ministers did? Yes we are sure, > because we have seen them done. And then, we even know that police and > military boss do not wait for their staff’s money to come voluntary, > but they just cut some amount of money from their pay-roll without > asking them. Who is going to dare to ask? > > But I’m sure those victims are going to whisper anywhere. There are > also all over the country, thousand and thousand influential private > Cambodian business middle classes, which have been doing the same > religious ceremonies? > > Yes! They did more than government officials do, as they have more > free times. How about the big money they have collected from hundred > innocent Buddhist Cambodian believers under their influence? Who is > going to be sure they did not corrupt? > > Is this an easy way for make easy money any time as needed? > > One more thing to finalize my very painful of low government class > officials: > > Some big guys did the same thing not only for religious ceremonies, > but for offering large amount of money to Cambodian RED CROSS of which > First lady Bunary Hun Sen is the president, for helping Cambodian > disaster victims. > > Those big guys did get big money from the cut of pay-roll of their > staffs far differently from civilian who did get money voluntary from > their subordinate officials through their job security worrisome. > > This is a smart way; big guys can show their faces through First Lady > Bunary, for making his loyalty known to Mr. Hun Sen at the expense of > their suffering staffs. > > Those entirely painful example stories mentioned above is an > imperceptible gigantic corruption, good Cambodian government needs to > find an adequate win-win strategy to legally control and overcome them > smoothly through some kind of know-how, from the US’s expert is best. > > But this could happen only if Mr. Hun Sen had political will, as he is > a very powerful Cambodian leader of our time. > > Mr. Hun Sen needs investigation? Yes? It’s an easy task! Please just > send Mr. Soy Sopheap to secretly ask questions hundred first class > soldiers and police officers. I am sure he will find lot evidences. > But I’m afraid Mr. Hun Sen will be silence for a big while before > taking any action and I think Mr. Soy Sopheap will be perhaps unable > to show on TV screen as he did on very small guys every day and > night . > > Look! The state religion promotes corruption in every angle of > Cambodian society, because it’s illegal to say something that is > happening very badly about Buddhism. People must all the time shut > their mouth, so please be understood that state should be separated > from religion, and Corruption will go down automatically at least 60% > and if with additional “none profit organization law”, it would be > gone more to 90%. > > Please beware that I did not criticize Mr. Hun Sen at all. Today I > swear and I pledge clearly declaring that Mr. Hun Sen is the best > Cambodian leader, most Cambodian and all foreign powers can trust more > than others, as we have been seeing all along, and there is no need to > mention about them. > > But I see under his shadow with this kind of Cambodian constitution, > in which there is no good judgment for Cambodian social evolution to > develop and adopt with, because there is extreme religious nationalism > integrated within an invisible corruption in every angle of Cambodian > government and social communities. > > But even though with the above prospective problem, we can still see, > in the next 10 years Thailand and Vietnam will be very difficult to > compete and challenge Cambodia due to Mr. Hun Sen news’s potential > openness economic policy, which has enormously been attracting foreign > investors and tourism as well. > > All of those Hun Sen’s works have been weighing on these two giants > neighbors that are unaware of being self-trapped with their own > beloved nationalism barriers for a long time to come. > > I really hope that Hun Sen will change and change the country until > sometime ahead obtaining good judgment for all Cambodian. > > Please remember that this Khmer social culture had already been built > thousand years before Mr. Hun Sen has born in this country. > > So please be patient, he need more times and a very big power in order > to be able to pass-over this current malicious Cambodian constitution, > before a real reform had happened. > > On Dec 24, 12:23 pm, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > > NK; > > > Thanks for your long comment. However, you have intentionally avoided > > to answer my question. Surely, it is your accepting the truth of what > > I ask you, and your deviating > > ... > > read more » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
