I agree Willem. I guess a good start would be to identify what features
are mapped vs. not mapped. I'll do up a wiki page for that and then we
can start creating JIRAs for these.
Cheers,
Jon
Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi
I think there are some gaps between the Camel DSL and Camel Spring
Configuration.
We can't write a Spring configuration file for all the Camel DSL.
I think we need do some work in Camel 1.5 to fill the gaps :)
Any thought?
Willem
Gert Vanthienen wrote:
L.S.,
Now that Camel 1.4 is out, we should probably take a look at the
roadmap for Camel 1.5 and 2.0. There are already quite a few issues
planned for 1.5 ([1]) and 2.0 ([2]). Perhaps this is a good time to
discuss the long-term goals and add issues for those to JIRA as
well. Chatting with James on IRC, he proposed we would focus on
usability and tooling for the next release. Personally, I would also
like to finish up the Scala DSL and add a Maven archetype to allow
people to really start using it, so we can ship our next release with
3 full-fledged DSLs. Any other suggestions?
Whenever we start developing on Camel 2.0, we would have a great
opportunity to remove some of the deprecated methods that we
(re-)introduced with Camel 1.4 and do some other API breaking
refactorings (like reducing code cycles, adding parameters to the
TypeConverter methods -- e.g. for encoding, use verbs for the DSL,
...). With a new major release number, users expect these kind of
changes, especially if we clearly add them to a migration guide in
the release documents. Are we going to do an intermediate 1.5
release (only deprecating methods as we move along) or will the next
release be 2.0 instead? Do we need to create a branch for allowing
bug fixes for 1.4 to be released in a Camel 1.5, while trunk is
moving towards 2.0?
On the documentation side of things, we already had a few
questions/remarks on improving the documentation about the DSLs
themselves. Any suggestions on how we can do this? There has also
been talk on revamping the look and feel of the website somewhat, to
make it easier for users to get started with Camel. Any ideas on this?
Regards,
Gert
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=11020&fixfor=11922
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=11020&fixfor=11900
