Sounds good!
2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi > > I propose a work plan such as: > > You and Hadrian should work on the remaining issues with refactoring the API > to remove the generics and get it as correct. You are the best people for > this work. Also very important that you guys look at the "remove unneeded > copies of exchanges". > > Then Jonathan can work on the renaming of the DSL's. And he could also help > removing the stuff that has been marked as @deprecated. He has already done > some of this stuff before. And as a 2nd priority to find the gaps in the > spring DSL vs. Java DSL. > > I would like to use this break to focus on the wiki documentation and my > tutorial that I need to continue on part 5. > > > Med venlig hilsen > > Claus Ibsen > ...................................... > Silverbullet > Skovsgårdsvænget 21 > 8362 Hørning > Tlf. +45 2962 7576 > Web: www.silverbullet.dk > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 6. november 2008 10:20 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not > > 2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hi >> >> Yeah could be a good idea to let 2.0.0 solely be focused on changing the API. >> - generics >> - verbs for DSL >> - remove @deprecated stuff >> >> And then we can be back on track with hammering 200+ issues every 3rd month. > > Yeah! I kinda think we should focus almost exclusively on the stuff > that might result in API changes ASAP. e.g. how fast can we get Camel > when its being used as a JMS <-> JMS router or a JBI <-> JBI router. > > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com/ > -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
