Sounds great guys. The less time we have to spend maintaining fixes branches, the better.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Oh Willem wanted to do the verbs. Well he and Jonathan can get it sorted. > Willem could also continue doing his important work on camel-cxf. > > Hadrian I doubt we have time to do anything for Camel 2.0.0 about your > great ideas of having the DSL auto generated. This is something for the > future such as Camel 3.0. 2.0 needs the API fixed and improved performance > without all the copying. And then better camel-jbi integration as well. > > So I guess we should let Willem and Jonathan have green lights for DSL > renaming. > > > > Med venlig hilsen > > Claus Ibsen > ...................................... > Silverbullet > Skovsgårdsvænget 21 > 8362 Hørning > Tlf. +45 2962 7576 > Web: www.silverbullet.dk > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 6. november 2008 10:32 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not > > Sounds good! > > > 2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi > > > > I propose a work plan such as: > > > > You and Hadrian should work on the remaining issues with refactoring the > API to remove the generics and get it as correct. You are the best people > for this work. Also very important that you guys look at the "remove > unneeded copies of exchanges". > > > > Then Jonathan can work on the renaming of the DSL's. And he could also > help removing the stuff that has been marked as @deprecated. He has already > done some of this stuff before. And as a 2nd priority to find the gaps in > the spring DSL vs. Java DSL. > > > > I would like to use this break to focus on the wiki documentation and my > tutorial that I need to continue on part 5. > > > > > > Med venlig hilsen > > > > Claus Ibsen > > ...................................... > > Silverbullet > > Skovsgårdsvænget 21 > > 8362 Hørning > > Tlf. +45 2962 7576 > > Web: www.silverbullet.dk > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 6. november 2008 10:20 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not > > > > 2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Hi > >> > >> Yeah could be a good idea to let 2.0.0 solely be focused on changing the > API. > >> - generics > >> - verbs for DSL > >> - remove @deprecated stuff > >> > >> And then we can be back on track with hammering 200+ issues every 3rd > month. > > > > Yeah! I kinda think we should focus almost exclusively on the stuff > > that might result in API changes ASAP. e.g. how fast can we get Camel > > when its being used as a JMS <-> JMS router or a JBI <-> JBI router. > > > > > > -- > > James > > ------- > > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > > > Open Source Integration > > http://fusesource.com/ > > > > > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com/ > -- Cheers, Jon http://janstey.blogspot.com/
