Hi,
Did you try end() to terminate the multicast? As in:
from(uri).
choice().
when(expr).multicast().to(uris).end().
otherwise().to(pojo);
Cheers
Hadrian
On Aug 6, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Louis Polycarpou wrote:
Louis Polycarpou wrote:
I'm trying to broadcast a feed to multiple endpoints but with
content-based selection. I assume I need to use multicast, however, I
can't achieve conditional multicast based on content selection
since I
can't use an otherwise() method after using
multicast().to("endpoint1",
"endpoint2")
Furthermore, the to() method supports a list of endpoints without
requiring a multicast first so what is the difference between that
and a
multicast().to(...)?
feed in -> multicast to two outputs
To recap with code:
1) I can't use otherwise after a multicast...
from(cnn).
choice().
when(xpath(filter)).multicast().to(im, archive); // I
can't now use otherwise()...
2) Do I really need multicast or can I just do the following...?
from(cnn).
choice().
when(xpath(filter)).to(im, archive).
otherwise().to(myPojo);
One way I've worked around this is to inverse the filter and do the
multicast in the otherwise() part but clearly this doesn't answer my
original question:
from(cnn).
choice().
when(xpath(filter)).to(stdout).
otherwise().multicast().to(im, archive);
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Multicast-with-choice-tp18861976s22882p18862033.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
