Hi,
That won't work since otherwise() cannot follow end(). Not in Camel 1.3.0.
Louis
Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Did you try end() to terminate the multicast? As in:
> from(uri).
> choice().
> when(expr).multicast().to(uris).end().
> otherwise().to(pojo);
>
> Cheers
> Hadrian
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Louis Polycarpou wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Louis Polycarpou wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to broadcast a feed to multiple endpoints but with
>>> content-based selection. I assume I need to use multicast, however, I
>>> can't achieve conditional multicast based on content selection
>>> since I
>>> can't use an otherwise() method after using
>>> multicast().to("endpoint1",
>>> "endpoint2")
>>>
>>> Furthermore, the to() method supports a list of endpoints without
>>> requiring a multicast first so what is the difference between that
>>> and a
>>> multicast().to(...)?
>>>
>>> feed in -> multicast to two outputs
>>>
>>> To recap with code:
>>>
>>> 1) I can't use otherwise after a multicast...
>>>
>>> from(cnn).
>>> choice().
>>> when(xpath(filter)).multicast().to(im, archive); // I
>>> can't now use otherwise()...
>>>
>>> 2) Do I really need multicast or can I just do the following...?
>>>
>>> from(cnn).
>>> choice().
>>> when(xpath(filter)).to(im, archive).
>>> otherwise().to(myPojo);
>>>
>>>
>>
>> One way I've worked around this is to inverse the filter and do the
>> multicast in the otherwise() part but clearly this doesn't answer my
>> original question:
>>
>> from(cnn).
>> choice().
>> when(xpath(filter)).to(stdout).
>> otherwise().multicast().to(im, archive);
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Multicast-with-choice-tp18861976s22882p18862033.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Multicast-with-choice-tp18861976s22882p18868476.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.