I havent loooked into the code thoroughly, I guess between the two options, the TX policy is a better place since dead letter is supposed to be turned off automatically when transactions are used, or at least i think that this is the intended beheviour.
For James suggestion: I think James essentially says that if we put this hidden functionality as a feature in TX as Claus suggests, then it still remains what should be done when no policy is defined. The consumer defaulting it might be ok. But I am thinking maybe the policy should be mandatory when transactions are used. Maybe throw an error if a route is transacted without a policy. I must definitely look the code because maybe what i am saying makes no sense and also i have some other things i ve not clarified. I ll come back after that so i can have a more informed opinion -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Please-keep-this-unintended-feature-in-camel-and-other-requests-tp21025627s22882p21040950.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.