Hi I have created a ticket for it so we wont forget https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1216
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:20 PM, radisb <rad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I havent loooked into the code thoroughly, I guess between the two options, >> the TX policy is a better place since dead letter is supposed to be turned >> off automatically when transactions are used, or at least i think that this >> is the intended beheviour. > Well after your last post at > http://www.nabble.com/Cast-a-copy-message-to-an-endpoint-when-exception-is-thrown-td21024810s22882.html > > I kinda have 2nd thoughts on configuring it on the TX. For instance > onException -> handled=true will also be bypassed for transacted > exchanges. What if you want this to be enabled for TX exchanges as > well? > > So we might wanna refactor the DLC a bit to better support TX and > non-TX exchanges so it can do common stuff for both. > > But for starters we might wanna have some more use-cases to use for > testing and having a solid ground before making any changes. > >> >> For James suggestion: I think James essentially says that if we put this >> hidden functionality as a feature in TX as Claus suggests, then it still >> remains what should be done when no policy is defined. The consumer >> defaulting it might be ok. But I am thinking maybe the policy should be >> mandatory when transactions are used. Maybe throw an error if a route is >> transacted without a policy. > How is this done in Spring today? It is after all the Spring TX that > is used under the covers. I think Camel should resemble what its > common sence in Spring. > >> >> I must definitely look the code because maybe what i am saying makes no >> sense and also i have some other things i ve not clarified. I ll come back >> after that so i can have a more informed opinion > Yeah please dig into the codebase. The error handling is not trivial > code, so always nice with more eyes > > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Please-keep-this-unintended-feature-in-camel-and-other-requests-tp21025627s22882p21040950.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > > /Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > -- /Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
