Just about finished reading my Christmas gift copy of

David Hockney's  Secret Knowledge

Hockney, as you probbaly know, is a famous artist and painter known for
using everything from xerox machines to actual oil paints. He's interested
in visual phenomenon and how we see as it relates to art. (He made an
interesting video a few years back comparing Canaleeto's almost photographic
paintings of Venice Italy with Chinese scroll painters who didn't bother to
use single point perspective.)

Anyway, this relates to us here because this book's premise is that what we
think of the Rennaisance Masters almost all used some form of optics. In
about 1430 he says the northern painters began using concave mirrors to
project images onto canvas. Later around 1600 the great painters began using
camera obscuras with lenses projecting upside down mirror reveresed images
on to their canvases. He points out that at this time all the wine glasses
once held in right hands in paintings were now in left hands. With the
development of better flat mirrors they were able to reflect the lens image
once to correct this. (looking through our view cameras we see things upside
down, but not mirror reversed. If we were to project the image onto a white
card we would see it reversed as well as upside down).

Because I have a background in both art history and photography I'm amazed
that it's taken this long to clearly sum up the use of optics in painting.
Much more work needs to be done and Hockney says almost nothing about focal
lengths and what actual lenses were available and that exist in museums.

For us here I think it relates directly to the interest in pinhole cameras.
I've been taping onto the front of my viewcamera everything from marbles, to
glass balls to magnifying glasses. I'm sure that's what the Rennaisance
painters did--tried everything. Many of these objects actually form images
that could be used for photographs. (A Magnifying glass 3" in diameter made
a funky image. placing a piece of black mat board with a 3/4" hold behind
the flat side of the glass gave me a smaller f-stop and a better image.

I predict that there will be a demand by artists for lenses and camera
obscuras. There's probably money in it for some enterprising person. I'm
just worried that the painters are going to go out and buy up all the neat
surplus lenses.

---William Nettles 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nettles Photo / Imaging Site  http://www.wgn.net/~nettles

_______________________________________________
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers

Reply via email to