"Ter McDonagh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
> I think I'm settling on the sliding box design with the front box
slightly
> larger (maybe 7"x7") and having tripod mounts and a lensboard holder. 
The
> smaller rear box will provide my focusing.  Being an engineer I'm angry
I
> didn't come up with the rear focus idea myself.
> 
> New questions are:
> [1]  With the double wall construction, I guess the inner walls can be
a
> much lighter material?  Maybe a heavy cardstock?


Apart from it's function as a light trap for the focusing box, 
the inner wall should also act as a trap for stray light to 
reduce flare. I'd suggest that you use something like balsa wood 
or foam core painted with Krylon Ultra Flat Black spray. Before 
assembling the sides, consider adding baffles to the innermost 
"box". You could hot-glue strips of black balsa or mount board 
across each side tilting toward the lens at a 45 degree angle. 
Any stray light from outside the framed portion would reflect 
from the baffle to the black box wall. The height and number of 
strips should be chosen so that they block your view of the inner 
box sides when you look through the back. The strips may be 
staggered on adjoining walls so you don't have to miter them.


> [2]  How do you guys get the two boxes to slide smoothly?  I'm thinking

> maybe some teflon runner angles or teflon tape.  It'll make it slide
easier, 
> but introduce more of a gap for light.  I don't have faith in myself to
make 
> the two boxes so closely aligned as to slide easily without some
"help".


You'd be best served by a close fit - with a 16" lens ease of 
fine focusing isn't that critical. You could leave a 1/16" 
between the outer and focusing boxes, and wrap the focusing box 
with glued strips of black velvet to act as a light trap. A 
couple of thumbtacks near the end of the outer and focusing box 
can be used to reduce friction. They are placed at weight bearing 
points - at the bottom rear of the outer box and top front edge 
of the focusing box. I'd make the box as long as possible.

After the camera is constructed and lens attached, you can 
determine balance points for tripod attachments to permit 
horizontal and vertical framing. Alternatively, the lens could be 
mounted on a board hinged at the bottom and backed by a short 
bellows to permit front tilt. That would be a useful feature for 
landscape photography. To keep things simple, the focusing back 
can be pulled out and rotated 90 degrees to change orientation. 
Rise and fall aren't that important for a long lens.


> [3]  For the interior I was planning to hit it with flat black primer
and
> blow in some flocking while it's still wet, let it dry, and then hit it
with
> another coat of primer.  Is this satisfactory?


It would work, but it isn't as effective as the baffles. Black 
velvet or paper velour glued to the interior before assembly 
traps light better.


> [4]  Since I'm planning on exposures of a couple seconds I was going to
go
> without a proper shutter at first.  Does a flap of black felt thrown
over
> the lens provide less chance of a blurred exposure than trying to put
on the
> lens cap?

The cap is more secure, and when it's held over the center of the 
lens, light to the film should be blocked. However, I wouldn't 
use the cap since exposures should be on the order of a fraction 
of a second. Since the lens which is long for the format and the 
on-film view angle is small, you probably can front mount a 
shutter to the lens without vignetting even if the opening is 
smaller. than the lens diameter. I checked a 19" lens by 
projecting a backlit 4x5 ground glass back onto a distant wall. 
When stopped down, there wasn't any vignetting with a Compur 1 
shutter at the front of the lens. With tilt, that might not be 
the case.

Other "features" might include a thumbscrew to lock focus and to 
prevent the back from sliding out, a carrying handle, a pop-up 
wire frame finder to check framing possibilities while holding the 
camera, a top or side mounted worm drive between the sections for 
fine focusing, etc... When used Speed Graphics were cheap (~$50),
the bellows, bed, etc. could be removed and the body used on
the back of a box camera to provide a shutter and GG focusing.
LF teles, better MF and 35 mm systems, and improved films
replaced the homemade setups and Big Berthas. 

________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com
_______________________________________________
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers

Reply via email to