On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 05:09 PM, S Woodside wrote:
On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 10:53 AM, Jasper Hauser wrote:
I checked a ton of old bugs for Camino and I'm amazed how many bugs are fixed or not reproducible. The bug list really needs a big refresh. Please help out.
I was just wondering Mike what you where going to do with all the bugs I checked. Are you going to recheck them and set them to fixed?
Any bug that was reported on a previous version and now works should be resolved to FIXED. Then it should be verified.
I disagree... this is what WORKSFORME is for... unless you know what fixed it. A variety of things may have happened since the initial report (from a site changing its code to work around the problem to mozilla code not following the same code path, to the bug actually being fixed you just don't know by what code). I generally avoid fixed unless I have a patch or a bonsai query or something to refer to.
In order to do this you need the proper bits in bugzilla. I am one other such person (aside from Mike). If you want to have the power to do this in Bugzilla, and think you deserve it :) then contact Mike or another person who has the power to grant power in bugzilla.
Indeed, I have no problem going through bugs that folks here are commenting on and making the changes. But, I was planning on suggesting to those who helped out (now that they have an idea of what's going on) to as for canconfirm or edit bugs permissions. Gerv is usually the person who handles such things (see: http://www.gerv.net/hacking/before-you-mail-gerv.html ) but it looks like he's away for a bit so it looks like Daniel Wang is the man right now <http://www.gerv.net/hacking/who-to-contact.html>
-- [ Chris Casciano ] [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ see things @ http://www.placenamehere.com ] [ read words @ http://www.chunkysoup.net/ ]
_______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
