Peter
On Dec 25, 2003, at 3:33 PM, Tristan O'Tierney wrote:
The biggest difference is, firebird was written as an attempt to slim down mozilla across all platforms. camino was written with the purpose to play nicely with the mac platform, and no other.
you'll notice the "little" differences, such as: if you right click on camino's dock icon, you can see your bookmarks. if you view the preferences panel, it looks like a normal mac's preferences panel. if you look at a webpage's forms, you'll notice that in camino they are native aqua controls, but in firebird they are ugly grey buttons and widgets :)
the tabs are native aqua tabs, not a theme hack.
You'll also notice that camino can import your bookmarks directly from safari. i'm sure i missed some, but that's the major ones.
--- Leung Man Chi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:hi,
I am very new to Mac, just got my 15" powerbook last week. all the while, I have been using mozilla and firebird lately.
anyway, a quick check, what is the difference between firebird Mac OSX port and this Camino in terms of stability and features?
of course, I will be very keen to look at camino
Regards, manchi
_______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
_______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
