Geoff: Tried the url got 99% or 100% cpu usage from my cpu widget when viewing the "games" But was able to move on to another page unlike some other times when I got these % Mark --- Geoff Beier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even just the report that it "feels" better is > useful; the performance I'm > expecting should be more easily "felt" than > benchmarked. > > There's not anything specific I can ask you to test. > I'm mainly looking for > 2 things: > > 1. If you have pages you don't like to visit in > camino due to beachballs or > processor usage, could you visit them and see if > things have improved? Not > coincidentally, most of mine are flash intensive. > For example, Camino slows > my machine down when I visit this page without the > patch but doesn't when I > visit with the patch: > http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail118.html > > 2. Let me know if you see any areas where this fix > degrades your everyday > browsing experience. > > So running it as you do normally is *very* helpful > :-) > > Thanks a lot! > > Geoff > > > On 11/21/04 1:49 PM, "Ruurd Koons" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I downloaded the package and started the new event > handling version. So > > far I'd like to say it feels faster, but that > might be only due to > > 'expectations'. > > > > Do you have any special things I should look at > more closely, like > > behaviour? And where exactly should improvements > be visible? On things > > like scrolling? Tab switching? > > > > Let me know if you want me to perform some special > things. I just run > > it now as I do normally, so far no problems found. > > > > > > Geoff Beier wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> In the past we've speculated that the way Camino > handles gecko events may be > >> responsible for some of the various performance > issues people report with > >> Camino. This includes but is not limited to CPU > usage during flash playback. > >> > >> I've got a patch up: > >> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271050 > >> > >> which drastically changes how gecko events are > dispatched. Because this code > >> is invoked so frequently and the change is so > dramatic, I need a lot of > >> testing before this will sound like a good idea > :-). > >> > >> It would help out a lot if as many folks as > possible could either build and > >> test or download the disk image here: > >> > http://www.speakeasy.org/~gbeier/Camino-perftest.dmg.bz2 > >> > >> and browse with the two builds included there. > The one in the "Old event > >> handling" folder should be very similar to > tonight's nightly. The only > >> difference between that one and the one in the > "New event handling" folder > >> is the above patch; this should make it easily to > isolate performance > >> differences introduced by this change. > >> > >> Anyone who gets to kick it around, please report > results back either to this > >> list or on the bug itself. > >> > >> Thanks in advance! > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Geoff > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Camino mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Camino mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
