folks used the site that Lorenzo listed here's my result G4 500MZ 896MB cable w/firewall on Test1 3.177 sec Test2 2.438 sec Test3 3.333 sec Test4 2.87 sec Test5 1.121 sec test6 11.65 sec total 29.07 weird results for test 6!! Mark
Used CFm --- Lorenzo Perone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jasper, here I go with the "CFMessage" version: > > (note: the url posted recently doesnt work anymore, > use > http://www.24fun.com/downloadcenter/benchjs/ > instead if you do the same tests as they seem to > need > the parent frameset now for the submit-JS) > > TEST 1 time: 1.68 sec. > TEST 2 time: 1.149 sec. > TEST 3 time: 1.583 sec. > TEST 4 time: 0.909 sec. > TEST 5 time: 0.419 sec. > TEST 6 time: 3.575 sec. > TEST 7 time: 1.162 sec. > TOTAL 10.48 seconds > > That's much closer to the "OEH Camino", still with > significantly > smoother layer test (6). I also think Test 6 > shouldn't count on the OEH > version because it is not displayed correctly (skips > frames...). > Test 1 isn't anymore a bottleneck, that's good news > :) > > I'm adding the test descriptions for reference... > > Test 1 counts to a 10000 and displays the figures > inside the status bar. > At the same time it displays a red progress > bar. > Test 2 opens eight red popup-windows and closes them > again > Test 3 replaces 300 tiny images as fast as possible. > It repeats this > procedure 10 times. > Test 4 manipulates a long text in different ways. > Test 5 creates 2000 table-cells and calculates a > random backgroundcolor > for each table-cell. > Test 6 creates a phrase out of 50 different layers > that are pulled > together. > Test 7 calculates the days of the week for the next > 10000 x-mas. > IMPORTANT: The test considers only the > calculating-time NOT the > time required to display the result! > > Regards, > LP > > On 23. Nov 2004, at 16:38, Jasper Hauser wrote: > > > Hi Lorenzo, > > > > An new build was put up that contains an even > better patch, have a look > > at bug > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271050 > and you will > > find the url. It would be nice if you could do the > same tests for us. > > > > Jasper > > > > On 23-nov-04, at 16:25, Lorenzo Perone wrote: > > > >> Hi, I've run both versions on the test page > >> > http://www.24fun.com/downloadcenter/benchjs/start.html > >> which is a good start point for this kind of > tests I think. > >> > >> It was tested on a dual 1.8ghz G5 in equal > conditions. > >> > >> New Event Handling Camino: > >> TEST 1 time: 6.2 sec. > >> TEST 2 time: 0.959 sec. > >> TEST 3 time: 1.663 sec. > >> TEST 4 time: 0.869 sec. > >> TEST 5 time: 0.36 sec. > >> TEST 6 time: 3.679 sec. > >> TEST 7 time: 1.103 sec. > >> TOTAL: 14.833 sec. > >> > >> Old Event Handling Camino: > >> TEST 1 time: 1.678 sec. > >> TEST 2 time: 0.909 sec. > >> TEST 3 time: 1.387 sec. > >> TEST 4 time: 0.843 sec. > >> TEST 5 time: 0.332 sec. > >> TEST 6 time: 3.107 sec. > >> TEST 7 time: 1.059 sec. > >> TOTAL: 9.315 sec. > >> > >> Note that while the new event handling camino > overall performs slower > >> (mainly bevause of the huge difference in Test 1, > which is a Javasript > >> loop), Test 6 (which is about moving a lot of > layers) performs much > >> smoother > >> than with the OEH - much more like Safari does in > this kind > >> of things. The OEH version seems to "cheat" on > that test (6) by just > >> skipping > >> a lot of frames. > >> > >> Keeping an eye on top showed only one peak at > 100% on test > >> 7 for both versions. Overall, the NEH Camino kept > usage under 30% CPU > >> while the OEH Camino was around 60%. > >> If I find out the right flags for top to sample > Camino's CPU usage in > >> a less > >> "user-dependant" way, I'll be happy to send you > the results... :) > >> > >> Hope it can help for the beginning, > >> > >> Regards, > >> Lorenzo > > _______________________________________________ > Camino mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
