Isn't it actually a 128 by 128, not 256 by 256? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Icon_Image
On 5/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I used to like it okay. But glassy things got overdone and it does have that disadvantage of looking small. When i turned a designer's eye at all the different browser logos/icons grouped together, i was surprised to find Seamonkey's leaping out as most eye-catching and upscale. Scott On May 3, 2006, at 09:53•, Silas Palmer-Cannon wrote: > I have just started using Camino yesterday, as this is when I first > heard about it. The only thing that I think is a little bit > 'unpolished' about the program is the icon. > > It isn't as weighty (visually) as I think it could be. All the > other icons for apps don't 'feel small' when you look at their > icons. The reason for this is that they use much of the icon > 256x256 canvas. Camino's icon does use the space, but not well in > my opinion. Perhaps you could consider expanding the size of the > inner circle till its visual weight felt consistent with other > major apps on one's dock. > _______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [email protected] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
_______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [email protected] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
