Out of curiosity, I took a quick stab at it, and it seems to me making the current icon slightly fatter won't necessarily make it look worse: (this is very unpolished) http://homepage.mac.com/kees/.Pictures/camicon.jpg
> From: Ricky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Camino List <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 06:31:04 -0400 > To: Camino List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Camino] Icon's weight doesn't quite fit. > > Isn't it actually a 128 by 128, not 256 by 256? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Icon_Image > > On 5/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I used to like it okay. But glassy things got overdone and it does >> have that disadvantage of looking small. When i turned a designer's >> eye at all the different browser logos/icons grouped together, i was >> surprised to find Seamonkey's leaping out as most eye-catching and >> upscale. >> >> Scott >> >> >> On May 3, 2006, at 09:53, Silas Palmer-Cannon wrote: >> >>> I have just started using Camino yesterday, as this is when I first >>> heard about it. The only thing that I think is a little bit >>> 'unpolished' about the program is the icon. >>> >>> It isn't as weighty (visually) as I think it could be. All the >>> other icons for apps don't 'feel small' when you look at their >>> icons. The reason for this is that they use much of the icon >>> 256x256 canvas. Camino's icon does use the space, but not well in >>> my opinion. Perhaps you could consider expanding the size of the >>> inner circle till its visual weight felt consistent with other >>> major apps on one's dock. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Camino mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino >> > _______________________________________________ > Camino mailing list > [email protected] > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino _______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [email protected] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
