Le vendredi 09 décembre 2011 à 11:11 +0900, Jacques Garrigue a écrit : > I do agree that the problem with ARM reflect some problem in the current > development > organization, but I don't think that you need to fork to solve it. > *(And note by the way that a real fork could be in contradiction with the > QPL.)*
I thought OCaml was a free software... Seriously, i don't understand why a fork would be a bad thing. There are lots of parts for which one don't need to be superman to contribute. And right now there are lots of trivial patches on the tracker that remain without response after several years, so there is clearly a need for improvement. Also the development of OCaml seems a bit opaque, we don't know where the discutions of the core team happen. Maybe it is on [email protected] but it is not public. I think people are interested (i am) about technical discutions on the compiler. Cheers, -- Jérémie -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
