On 12/09/2011 03:24 PM, Benedikt Meurer wrote: > > Right. I would like to place focus on discussing this point, as it > seems to be the root of the evil. It would be so easy to fix, IMHO, > and you don't need to give up control by the core team. Why not > accept a model similar to i.e. the NetBSD project, with a lot of > committers (experts in their own areas) and 2-3 people to keep an > eye on the overall direction? >
or instead of changing how OCaml is currently handled by INRIA's team, we could consider some development model similar to Eglibc's one. Eglibc is not a fork of glibc, but a glibc distribution. http://lwn.net/Articles/333755/ could be an interesting read (for those who care). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
