On Dec 10, 2011, at 00:24 , Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

>>> Whether you call it a "fork" or a "distribution" doesn't matter.
>> 
>> It does, IMHO. Forking a project allows you to integrate more intrusive
>> changes, and doesn't force you to stay compatible (in some way) with the
>> original work. That's, in my understanding, the biggest difference
>> between the two approaches.
>> 
>> Regards,
> 
> Lets call it a half-way house for patches. Half way between the author
> of the patch and the ocaml core team. A place to share patches with
> other distributions prior to the ocaml core team including them.

I don't care for the name. I'm fine with "community distribution".

> MfG
>        Goswin

greets,
Benedikt

-- 
Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

Reply via email to