On Dec 18, 2011, at 15:50 , Alexandre Pilkiewicz wrote: > Hi Benedikt
Hey Alexandre, >> [1] >> https://github.com/downloads/bmeurer/ocaml-arm/ocaml-arm-3.12.1+20111218-benchmark.pdf > > Could you by any chance give the execution time (one should be enough > since we have the ratio) and measurement technique of your benchmarks? Sure. Measured as combined user + system time with best result of 5 subsequent runs (Linux kernel was 2.6.31.14.25-efikamx in all tests), here are the execution times (in seconds): 3.12.1 armel: ------------- almabench 455.020 bdd 6.560 boyer 7.310 fft 21.770 nucleic 74.720 quicksort 1.640 sieve 0.120 soli 0.060 sorts 20.190 ocaml-arm armel: ---------------- almabench 455.500 bdd 6.650 boyer 7.230 fft 21.910 nucleic 74.110 quicksort 1.570 sieve 0.110 soli 0.060 sorts 20.950 ocaml-arm armhf: ---------------- almabench 111.810 bdd 6.590 boyer 7.120 fft 6.680 nucleic 19.430 quicksort 1.570 sieve 0.110 soli 0.070 sorts 20.900 > Thanks in advance > Alexandre HTH, Benedikt -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
