On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 02:03:48 +0000, Isaac Gouy wrote:
> C version : 12.11 secs
> OCaml version : 47.22 secs
> OCaml version with GC parameters tuned ("interesting alternative"
section) : 12.67 secs
And of course you know because that GC tuned OCaml program is shown
on the
benchmarks game website ;-)
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/program.php?test=binarytrees&;
lang=ocaml&id=1
Since you are here, please explain why C can use memory pools and vec
tor instructions but tuning the GC of OCaml ― although it is part of
the standard library ― is considered an “alternative”.
Best,
C.
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
