Ed Keith <e_d_k <at> yahoo.com> writes: > > > I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a JUSTIFICATION > > for them (which you > > > have been incapable of providing so far). > > > > I feel no need to provide a JUSTIFICATION to you for > > anything. > > > > Am I to interpret this to mean that the rules are purely arbitrary and capricious with no though behind them?
Tendentious. A great deal of thought has been given to all aspects of the benchmarks game. > I hope I am misinterpreting this statement, but can think of no other interpretation Poverty of imagination. _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
