Hey, guys. Time to stop this, please. Thanks, David
On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote: > Ed Keith <e_d_k <at> yahoo.com> writes: > >>>> I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a JUSTIFICATION >>> for them (which you >>>> have been incapable of providing so far). >>> >>> I feel no need to provide a JUSTIFICATION to you for >>> anything. >>> >> >> Am I to interpret this to mean that the rules are purely arbitrary and > capricious with no though behind them? > > Tendentious. > > A great deal of thought has been given to all aspects of the benchmarks game. > >> I hope I am misinterpreting this statement, but can think of no other > interpretation > > Poverty of imagination. > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
