On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 14:26, Jenna Fox <a...@creativepony.com> wrote: > I wouldn't bother with reducing the revision number. If anything > having weirdly high ones makes the project seem more alive and active. > Is the minor number even functionally useful here? Maybe we should > ditch that and just keep major as a "look! An increment! Heaps cool > stuff must have happened!" unless google chrome has ruined new major > numbers for everyone anyway.
Well, it's useful for computability reasons. Every app created on 2.x should work on 2.x+n with minimal required changes. _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
