On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Isak Andersson <icepa...@lavabit.com>wrote:
> ** Actually setting up a reverse proxy gives better performance for the > end user As you can have some sort of buffer between them. The Unicorn > server takes care of whatever nginx asks for, and while it waits it can > server whatever unicorn outputs. It doesn't have to wait for what it > outputs itself to get done because you have a queue. Or something like that. > Mh I am not really sure it would be a better performance as it would be anyway more than one process. I think that phusion passenger is pretty much the most robust solution for this. > > Some people actually out Apache to do PHP stuff while nginx acts as a > reverse proxy and actually shows things to the user in the same way you'd > do with Unicorn/Thin > Well this would be even more load as two web servers will run at the same time. Apache + Phusion passenger already lets you run .php or anything you want. But this is not the issue really. I think this is all fine in term of mono user. Question: if you have 100 users how do you configure it ? How can you add webdav support on the top of the Nginx + unicorn setup ? But perhaps That's too much for a server ment to serve other peoples > applications! Then you have to scale down the resources used. > > I am open to anything but if I can't do something I might ask for some brave volunteers to set it up as I really never tried anything else beside for local/quick test deployment.
_______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list