On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 06:13:40 +0100, you wrote: >On 3, Aug 2006, at 0:50, Bob Wood wrote: > >> I will communicate these findings to Nick in case he doesn't pick them >> up >> from here. I expect he will be very pleased about the work he will >> have to >> do to correct them, but I'll explain to him that it is all Beeky's >> fault and >> the rest of us were happy with the way things are now. > >I'll have to read this later Bob. But I was happy with it until my >interpretation sparked ridicule the other day ! Until then Canalplan >was gospel, in my book.
Just a quick email to say: 1) I'd spotted the good Captain's first email on the subject, and put it into my "ooh, I must look at that" box. 2) Bob's Sherlockian research has pinned down 4 data bugs in CanalplanAC, rather than any coding bugs. 3) I will patch the database, and release it tonight. Thanks to you both for finding and tracking down - and to Bob in particular for saving me the detailed and tedious work. Canalplan may be gospel, but even the gospel's can contain typos! -- On-line canal route planner: http://www.canalplan.org.uk (Waterways World site of the month, April 2001) My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
