I can confirm the last two locks mentioned as I have navigated both of them 
when they were tidal.Chris.KP


----- Original Message ----
From: Neil Arlidge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, 25 May, 2007 10:55:40 AM
Subject: [canals-list] Re: Richmond Lock

Adrian Stott wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] demon.co. uk wrote:
>
>> Are there any other British tidal locks that are boater-operated?
>
> Hanham.
>
> Old Ford (Lee) used to be.

Shirley these two are in to semi-tidal bits and we were refering to the 
locks at the head of a tideway?...I suppose boats do go up the Avon and over 
Netham Weir
If you are including Hanham and Old Ford (Lee), then you should also include 
Keynsham, as it is often tidal above Hanham Weir.
Also it is often tidal above Brownshill Staunch (we have been through this 
on the level) and therefore St Ives Lock should be included.
Before Barmby Barrage was built , I suppose that the first lock, (West 
Cottingwith) on the Pockling ton and Elvington Lock on the Derwent were 
boater operable locks at the head of the tideway.
>
> City Mill may be again soon (sort of). Carpenters Road too, I guess.
>
> Adrian
>
>
> Adrian Stott
> 07956-299966

I have thought of another couple, the Watergate in Chester Weir, and Grove 
Hill Lock onto Beverley Beck - well we did them ourselves. I also suppose 
that if you knew Harry Mayor you used to be able to do Tarleton Lock 
yourselves. Again Widnes Lock and Fiddlers Ferry Locks are operated by the 
local boat club.

-- 
Neil Arlidge - NB Earnest - Shannon Reg 7410
Read about the start of our Irish travels at:
http://www.tuesdayn ightclub. co.uk/Tour_ 07/April_ 07/index. html
Visit this site and help save our waterways from the DEFRA cuts
http://www.saveourw aterways. org.uk/ 





      ___________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for
your free account today 
http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to