> On the other > hand, the soiled sheet of toilet paper who provoked the reaction continues > to spout on the list regardless, as if we have all forgotten his appalling > behaviour. > > Now isn't that unjust?
Because like you Steve he has a right to post messages to this list and I have to say that it is you who is being personal not him. You might not like his views on how economics really works but I do get the impression that there are many in this group who feel it's only right and proper that the taxpayer should subsidise the canals so that they can continue with their lifestyle choice/hobby without paying the full cost. It might be dressed up in preservation of history/enhancing the environment etc but that's what it amounts to. Given some of the highest levels of taxation in Western Europe taxpayers might start to question such largesse. CXolin [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
