On 26 Sep 2008, at 21:34, sean neill wrote: > But when you remove a boat from the water, more water is required to > fill up the gap where the boat once was. So shouldn't there be a > charge every time the canoe is removed? > > (or at least in the "take everything five steps beyond its logical > conclusion" world in whioch much of this debate is taking place.) > -- > Nigel Stanley > > Shirley this implies that people who don't have a boat at all should > pay > a charge for the water BW has to put into the system to compensate for > their boats which aren't there?
Thank goodness you are back Sean, to bring some sanity to the proceedings. Beeky
