I like this idea all that is need is to do is fix a price for the licence not to have a boat and BW funding has been solved for good. Only problem I can see is will there be a need for a no-Boat Safety Certificate before they can purchase the no boat licence.
Paul sean neill wrote: > But when you remove a boat from the water, more water is required to > fill up the gap where the boat once was. So shouldn't there be a > charge every time the canoe is removed? > > (or at least in the "take everything five steps beyond its logical > conclusion" world in whioch much of this debate is taking place.) > -- > Nigel Stanley > > Shirley this implies that people who don't have a boat at all should pay > a charge for the water BW has to put into the system to compensate for > their boats which aren't there? > > Sean > > >
