"Garry George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>I also think there should be a list not of individuals needs, but of 
>what is needed for the many, after discussion and debate, the list 
>then should be the one BW hears about the most. Whilst there is 
>bickering about the small things, the bigger issues are sorted out in 
>the background.

Strongly agree.

One of the serious problems with both the BW and BWAF papers is that
there is no methodology specified for evaluating proposed amendments
to the system of charges.  As a result, the BWAF list of
recommendations is just a bunch of "hey, we think this might be a good
idea, and will make our friends pay less" ideas.

A proposed methodology would need to be the subject of *serious*
consultation, too.  I mean, just look at the disagreements here about
what the rules ought to be for charging.  But I do think that is the
way to start the full review of the charging system that seems to be
so badly overdue.

Adrian

.

Adrian Stott
07956-299966

Reply via email to