On 28 Sep 2008 at 17:52, George Pearson wrote:
> it means that the idea of charging
> based on "maximum cruising range" must be discarded -- that inevitable
> conclusion is the whole purpose of my argument.
Hey Rog. At the time I posted the above, I think you were still reading
the thread I posted it in.
Now three days and no reply to this from Adrian. Suggests capitulation
to me. Should this be pointed out or let sleeping dogs lie?
The other odd thing I've noticed is that whenever I post in this sort of
thread, no-one ever directly disputes or supports anything I've said
except for Adrian. Perhaps I was being a bore or stating the obvious.
Or is there a UK cultural thing to defer to the list manager? Just
curious, but give it to me straight.
Been sidetracked on the boat lately ...
- george
