Andrew Dyke wrote: > From: "Adrian Stott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Hint: 7:48. Or to use the format the Today folk insist on (but often >> get wrong) "12 minutes to 8". > > Sir A, > I have been looking at this post for some time to see if I am missing > something. Can't see it, please explain why 7.48 is not the same as 12 > minutes to 8?
You've clearly got far too much time on your hands. Terry Streeter NB Arun - Stockton
