For most canal boats this legislation is fairly straight forward and
reasonable. However for those on river navigations with cruiser type
boats it could be more problematic. My understanding is that for example
that the speed limit is not exactly as Bruce suggests but is if the hull
is designed to exceed 7 knots. A high speed hull with a length on the
waterline of less than 2 m, given enough power, can easily exceed 7 knots.
I would guess that some people could get caught because they mistakenly
believe they are exempt because their boat is less than 7m long and only
has a small engine when in fact it is designed to exceed the speed limit.
Regards
Paul
Bruce Napier wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2009, at 15:01, Roger Millin wrote:
>
>
>> Are there sufficient drink-steering problems on the canals though to
>> justify this requirement?
>> We've all seen pretty merry groups of lads (usually) on hire boats but
>> what is the track record of damage to themselves or other people?
>> Now small, high speed, speedboats/jet skis close inshore near a beach,
>> that's a different matter perhaps as I have heard of injuries in that
>> sort of scenario........but, depending on length they will be exempt
>> AIUI.
>>
>
>
> I don't see that you can easily legally distinguish between the
> canals and rivers and the Broads, where drink boating is much more of
> a problem. The evidence behind the decision to include "non-
> professional mariners" came from the MAIB. It does seem likely that
> the commonest form of drink boating on the cut, the stag/hen party on
> a day hire boat, will escape as a lot of those are under 7 meters/23
> feet, and not capable of more than 7 knots.
>
> As I read the cover letter for the consultation, the jet ski problem
> is recognised, it's just going to require its own bit of regulation
> to sweep it into the net, rather than get it entangled with this one.
> It is _only_ jet skis, because they are not "used for navigation".
> Ordinary speed boats are ships within the meaning of the Act, and
> will be caught by it if capable of >7 knots. To escape, the vessel
> must be *both* less than 7 meters long *and* not capable of exceeding
> 7 knots.
>
> The choice of 7 metres and 7 knots is down to an existing definition
> in the COLREGS apparently; it's the exemption from having to carry
> nav lights
> ––
> All the best
>
> Bruce
>
> There are no strangers on the cut, only boaters we've yet to meet.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
