Bob Wood <[email protected]> wrote: >2009/4/30 tiamiboat <[email protected]>: > >> It will take sometime for the actual new structure to be worked out. > >My boating life doesn't go back as far as many on here; my first hire >was only in the latter part of 1997. But in the time since then it >seems to me that BW has gone through one reorganisation after another. > Am I right?
No. It was one reorganisation before another. [email protected] wrote: >I thought this what you might mean, but we are into unchartered territory >here. Normally a charity would not operate in deficit and I suspect there are >stringent rules regulating it. There are certainly stringent rules regulating >charities operating in surplus as evidence by the problems the RSPCA got into >not so long ago. > >For me this debate underlines how much I need to know before deciding what I >think about this idea. Have a look at the recent KPMG report on BW's structure. It discusses the idea in detail. There's some good thinking in it. Or, if you'd prefer <g>, you could look at my article about it in WW 2009 January page 72. Adrian Adrian Stott 07956-299966
