It's not anything for which EH need to be "notified". It's on the agenda of the Council's conservation people later this week.
Steve --- In [email protected], "bloovee" <s.paris...@...> wrote: > > I think: BW owns the wall, City Council owns the street (the towpath). > > Adding stones to the wall would change the wall (which is listed as three > separate sections between streets) whereas the planned post/rail/glazing just > hangs over the wall. The lock is listed. It's in the Whitworth Street > conservation area. There's nothing to suggest the Council has consulted > English Heritage, and I'll be talking to EH today. > > Steve > > > --- In [email protected], chris potter <chriskpotter@> wrote: > > > > Questions Who owns the wall? who owns the towpath? has listed building > > consent been applied for by the council? Another observation the wall is > > quite low at this point the simplest solution would be to insert a extra > > course or two of matching stonework below the capping stones. Preserve our > > heritage from meddling planners! CKP > > > ________________________________ > > From: chris potter <chriskpotter@> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Saturday, 2 May, 2009 17:36:34 > > Subject: [canals-list] Canal to be fenced off > > > My reply to this topic got lost somewhere? Safety for who? certainly not > > for boaters and if anyone falls in the fence would impede rescue. This is > > an ill conceived barmpot idea and should be knocked on the head. Heritage > > would be destroyed.How about getting the lock listed as a as listed > > structure? it may already be/ at one time they planted parking meters along > > the towpath now fortunatly gone.I am sure this is a conservation area in > > any event.CKP >
